It means that the humans of that time are so swelling that the result of that expansion is the killing of an illusion — quantum mechanics.
Physical jokes: “If you first learned quantum mechanics and thought you understood it, it means you don’t understand it. I’m sorry.
That’s what Bol, the founder of quantum mechanics, said.
Why would quantum mechanics get such a strange assessment?
Because quantum theory looks like a mythology, and it’s hard to fully understand it in the first place for people who have experienced classical physics.
Today, in order to blow this great cow, let’s stretch the timescale and start with the origin of science.
Since its birth, humankind has worked hard to understand the world.
The first idea, full of imagination, evolved into a “religion” to explain the world with a full system of gods.
For example, why thunder and lightning? That’s because of the thunder and lightning.
Of course, that’s not true.
A wise man soon realized that God doesn’t rain, it has nothing to do with you!
So the smart people are thinking about what the world is, why things fall, why the sun rises and falls, and so on.
But the early wise men were sitting in their offices looking at the world by a brainstorm, not by observation and experimentation.
After all, smart people, with a long period of time, have been able to emptied out some of the cynics, and this simple thinking has slowly evolved into “philosophies.”
But the problem is not solved.
Everyone says, while this job is decent, who is right and wrong? Zhang San says the world is on the back of turtles and Lee says the sky is round.
Can’t they go out and check it out? Of course not!
What is the extent of this exaggeration when the earth does it, and the tongue is only spoken?
Aristotle believes that “women have fewer teeth than men” and that one theory has been dubbed classic for hundreds of years, and no one has been open for centuries to count who has more teeth.
It’s been a long time since you’ve studied the world on your head.
In the 17th century, a guy suddenly flashed and did an experiment.
As for Galileo, you may have heard of the Bisa slopes free fall test. Galileo dropped a large, small and two iron balls at the same time on the pisa slope tower, and would it be possible to verify that something heavy is falling faster than something light.
Galileo was the first person to systematically use experiments to study things, and that’s the first form of “science,” so Galileo is great and sits on the second level of physics.
Do you think you and I are scientists for centuries?
Don’t be naive, but Aristotle, who often appears in a negative image, is definitely the smartest person at the time, and the “in ignorance” created by the limitations of the times is not ignorance.
Let’s continue, gentlemen, “The world is made up of gold, wood and earth,” the subject of philosophy or science?
Science and philosophy were a family 500 years ago! Just a year after Galileo died, Newton was born!
If you think it was Newton’s three laws that made Newton a great mistake.
Newton’s representative is The Math of Natural Philosophy, and that’s the name that explains everything. It’s the math that’s in natural philosophy.
Newton systematically introduced mathematical tools into research, based on Galileo, not only doing experiments, but also further using mathematics to explain experimental phenomena, which completely separates “philosophy” from “science” and opens the prelude to classical physics.
Newton was the first person to study the world with a system of mathematical tools, which is fundamentally different from the simple mathematical tools that Galileo uses, so Newton is much greater and has no dispute about the history of physics.
Now that Newton’s done the demonstration, the others are not stupid.
Over the next few centuries, the world’s essence has been constantly studied in mathematics and experiments by various kinds of bulls, which have gradually formed the building of classical physics.
Religions, philosophy, science, the troikas drive human civilization forward.
The advantage of science lies in mathematics, which allows science to describe accurately, repeat precisely, and spread quickly, which is very important, so that you can build on others, so science can grow rapidly over 300 years.
And religion is often based on “aware” like “creature” and you can’t describe the process mathematically, so you can’t repeat it, so it’s difficult to validate and learn, so it’s difficult to develop this theory.
Ultimately, “science” has irreduciblely united human perceptions, and although anti-ideologicalism has prevailed in the West in recent years, it does not affect the absolute mainstream of science.
Today, countless scientific formulas and theories are intertwined, testifying to each other, using each other, and conciliatingly interpreting the world.
All right, class, here’s the thing. What’s “conformity”?
For example:
How much do you weigh, little girl? – 50 kilos.
How do you know that? – It’s called weight.
Is that a yes? – The spring has been calibrated.
How do you calibrate the spring? – With standard codes.
Where did you get that? – Standard metal.
What’s the size? – On a scale.
How’s the scale? – Calibration with lasers.
I don’t know.
The problem is endless, and different scientific theories testify to each other, but humans will never know the truth about the weight of a young girl.
As if the police solved the case, 100 witnesses and 1,000 evidence were perfect for each other, then the police thought it was the truth, and what the truth was doesn’t matter anymore.
Is it wrong for humans to interpret the world so harmoniously?
Billions of people, thousands of theories, 300 years of running, never making the slightest mistake! People with a little common sense of statistics know that the probability of the system going wrong is too small.
Yes, but the small probability still means it’s possible.
This “possible” is “quantitative mechanics” and “relativity” – two impressive theories that will destroy centuries of classical physics!
A lot of people don’t know what “classic” of classical physics means, but, frankly, it’s something that fits your imagination: thermals, mechanics, electromagnetics, opticals, acoustics, and so on.
Even if physics is worse, there will certainly be basic scientific commons, as mentioned in the publication, and it is believed that the garage car will not be moved to the living room at once. That’s what the classics mean, because Newton was the first to start with classic physics, so it’s called Newton physics.
A long circle around which quantum mechanics begins.
On the last day of the 19th century, the world’s leading scientists gathered to take stock of the old century and look forward to the new century, and the most intelligent people have come to a conclusion that now seems absurd:
We’ve got all the science we need, the sky, the ground, the water, the stars, the atoms, the visible, the invisible, the theoretically sound.
That’s what they said:
“The building of physics has been built, leaving behind a few pent-up restorations, and the beautiful and clear sky is covered by two clouds.”
And then the narcissistic people are so happy that they don’t have to work anymore!
This is the famous “two dark clouds” of physics, when physicists believed that all of science was left with these two problems.
Now let’s look at Aristotle. Think he’s a good classmate?
It’s called time limits.
So the question is, what kind of cloud can cover everyone’s eyes?
The first black cloud.
The ancients thought that there was nothing in space, that modern science knew there was air, and that the transmission of sound required air.
In this way, is there anything else in space that you don’t know, or how the sun goes to Earth?
Then I found it and I couldn’t find it. It’s hard for physicists to call it the first cloud in the physics building.
Soon the second cloud came up.
It was discovered during the experiment that the radiation energy was probably not continuous.
The White Word translates: We know that people are a little tall. If one day you find out you’re eating, eating, not tall, eating and then eating, and suddenly you’re 5 cm tall, is your science going to collapse?
The second cloud had a similar impact on physicists at the time.
After all, these dark clouds are in front of us. As a result, physicists have come up with a mythical theory to meet the experimental phenomenon, the extent of which is very different from fairy tales.
Finally, with your careful attention, the first cloud was born of relativity and the second cloud of quantum mechanics. Let’s start with the second, quantum mechanics.
Because of the circumstances, many important figures and theories have been omitted, and there are differences in time and time.
Look out, we’re going to have a scene! At the end of the nineteenth century, Lumel, who owed it, performed an “in bold radiation experiment”, found that, according to the theory available at the time, the radiation energy would become infinite as the wavelength decreased.
“Don’t be afraid, energy is one of the things that spread.” This is the beginning of quantum mechanics.
What does that mean? It’s like people are a little bit tall, not just a little bit long, and everyone’s in a hurry.
Einstein’s coming back. Is that one of them?
The light is not a continuous straight line, but it’s like a bunch of bullets, one by one. This explains the experimental phenomenon of “photo-electricity” in such a way that Einstein went to win a Nobel Prize.
Debreaux would like to see it. It’s been proven as a series of waves since Master Bull’s time.
And then a blow to the head: Is it possible that the light is both continuous and one grain, and that, in turn, would it be a single particle of physical particles such as electrons, atoms and molecules?
Debreo wanted to be cold and sweaty, so he proposed “Debreo Pibo”, also known as material waves.
In other words, all particles are both particle- and volatile, in other words, a person can be both a woman and a man.
What’s weird is that this is an experiment to prove that a machine gun shot was actually a wave-shaped advance!
It’s almost as if ordinary people see ghosts!
It’s hard for everyone to think that if all the particles are volatile, then the people, the house, even the Earth… can’t even think about it!
What matters more is why the particles are like this!
It’s completely different from the electrons, protons, atoms you all knew, as if all physicists had fallen in love overnight, and said to their girlfriend, “I never thought you were such a person. You’ve changed, and I don’t know anything.”
Yeah, I think the physicists felt that way!
It was a painful thing to lose love, and the physicists went crazy, presented a mythical atom model, and it was nothing like a drunk nonsense.
After that, a man named Boer finally explained the same theory of shit as the Bol model on hydrogen atoms.
E-orbits are also, presumably, non-continuous and are part of a series.
Take the macroworld satellite, for example: a satellite can circle in an orbit of 500 kilometres, and give a little energy to reach an orbit of 501 kilometres.
What’s with the electro-orbit?
You give a little energy, the satellite’s 500 km, and the satellite’s still not moving, and give, give, give, give, when the energy is enough, the satellite suddenly moves into an orbit of 600 km, as if the space between 500 km and 600 km did not exist.
That’s how the Bolt model works.
This article begins with a mockery of the fact that you can’t learn quantum mechanics for the first time. The title of the Danish newspaper: “We football players won the Nobel Prize for Physics.” I’m sorry.
The Chinese people are running away…
Guys, is there a concept of quantum?
It’s not continuous, it’s a paragraph.
Everyone looks at Paul like they’re drunk and they’re talking nonsense. And so, you look back and you look back and you look at what you’ve done!
Unfortunately, the Bol model, which perfectly explains the characteristics of hydrogen atoms, such as the spectral spectrum of hydrogen atoms, the relationship between the constants of hydrogen atoms, and questions such as “Why is the electrons around the atomic nuclei not being sucked into the atomic nuclei?” The Bol model kills the girl who eats hydrogen atoms.
But when the Bolt model reached out to the other girls, it suddenly went off! Even with a proton of helium atoms.
Since this technique isn’t very popular, everyone’s relieved and seems to have a chance!
Among them, the cold and noble “unusual semantic effect” has been ignoring the Bolt model, not even looking at it.
The so-called anomaly of the Seman effect, in short, with a little magnetic field, the electro-orbits are split into several pieces, a situation that the Bol model cannot explain at all.
So, other physicists continue to be so dedicated that they can’t make a smile. At a time when there is little at hand, two unknown doctoral students in the Netherlands (which belongs to the elementary school class in the physical sphere) have put forward a vision:
Electronics have spin properties and only two directions. The two children also published their papers, but they later regretted it, and they also felt so ridiculous, trying to find a mentor to take them back and comfort them.
The big drop in the glasses, the “unusual semantic effect” smiles!
The whole world is boiling! As soon as the two children took the lead, they realized that they were going to sing, “Look at the girl across the street! I’m sorry.
Not just electronics, including protons, atoms and even photons, all of which are cycling.
The spin eventually became one of the most important theoretical foundations of quantum mechanics!
However, the spin has made things more perplexing, and this weird, birthright agglomeration cannot be described by a rotation in classical physics, because it is not only contrary to relativism, but also does not explain why the rotation has two directions!
Using the macro-world gyro, for example, a suspended gyro is spinning, either vertically or upside-down, as if there were two axes in the void, and deadly gyro in one direction.
Well, isn’t this a bit like magic?
Although this theory has made us all worse, it has saved the bubbles that have struggled with how electronics are distributed.
And Bari-Musathon opened and said: “A mountain shall not be a tiger unless it is a male and a female.”
This is the essence of the “bull-incompatible principle”: the same electron orbit can accommodate only one electron, unless the electron cycling is the opposite, which means that one orbit can accommodate only two electrons at most.
That is, at an altitude of 500 kilometres, there can be only one satellite, unless the second satellite rotates in the opposite direction, but in any case it is never possible to drop the third satellite, as if it were magic.
It’s like a 1,000-metre-long house with only one man and two women, and once a third person goes in, one person gets squeezed out.
In the end, the principle of bubbling incompatibility is an important foundation of quantum mechanics!
It’s a bunch of crazy theories, and it’s a complete science of Newton’s hard work. It’s bad for you to be such a girl!
In particular, the author of history’s specialty, De Boiro, introduced the concept of a material wave because of the lack of a mathematical background and the incompetence of his dissertation.
The paper was then passed on to Derby, a wrinkled one, and it was insulting.
So we found Shertyon.
And when Shertyon was also a quiet little student of Derby’s, he said: O Xue, gather up a formula for the matter, and make the essay of the humanist more decent.
The only way she can do this is to wipe her ass, suffocate her “silent equation.”
And then God made another joke, and no one thought that the equation used to wipe his ass was the basic guide!
The Schertinger equation describes the basic pattern of microparticles’ motion, making one of the most important formulas in quantum mechanics.
How scoundrel is that?
Q: Where’s the girl?
The girl is either in school or at home.
It’s classic physics. Everyone understands.
Q: Where’s the girl?
A: 20% of girls in school, 30% on the road, 50% at home.
Where the hell is she?
That’s 20% at school, 30% on the road, 50% at home.
Did she split up? She’s still one.
Then ask me, where is the girl now?
Already asked, 20% at school, 30% on the road, 50% at home
Is it going to collapse…
The Shertyon formula has forced Shertyon to destroy himself.
It was good that the meaning of the equation was subsequently understood in Bonn, where the concept of a “trigger wave” was introduced.
That is to say, particles can be seen anywhere in a moment, and the probability of being found in different places is calculated using the “triple wave function ” .
For example, you’re going to Hangzhou in Ningbo, where you have to go through Shao Xing, which is classic physics.
And Scherding’s equation tells us that you’re in these three cities at random. You don’t have to drive in the middle. The probability of being in different cities is calculated by his equation.
Of course, it goes without saying that the probability of transient human movement is so small that even when measured in the time of the universe, it does not necessarily happen, but if humans are as big as atoms, the results of wave functions are very different.
What we know about nuclear fission is that, because different particles in the atoms are randomly located in different positions, the macros seem to be atoms.
According to this theory, with bad luck, your cell phone could suddenly disperse and split into atoms.
Heisenberg looked at it and thought it was lucky, so he suggested the “uncertainty principle” and called the “uncertainty principle”: The amount and position of the particle cannot be measured at the same time and the multiplier of both is always greater than a value. Note that this is not technical, but theoretical.
Technically, measurement will inevitably affect the person being measured, and the error caused by this principle is called the “observer effect” — for example, if you look at the color of a thing, you have to look at it with a light, and it’s bound to interact, and it’s not the original.
Heisenberg’s theory of uncertainty is not the same as that of the observer effect, but the principle of uncertainty is an attribute of the thing itself, an essential attribute, and it has nothing to do with whether or not you look at it. This theory is also an important foundation of quantum mechanics.
Heisenberg is a very busy host, translating the principle of uncertainty into a very long white word for philosophers:
“In the karma statement, this karma is the karma that philosophy often says karma, `If you know exactly what you want now, you can see the future’, and it is not the conclusion, but the premise, because we cannot know all the details of the present, which is a theoretical principle. I’m sorry.
It’s okay not to read it. I repeat.
“In the karma statement `if you know exactly what you can see now’, it is not the conclusion, but the premise, because we cannot know all the details of the present, it is a theoretical principle. I’m sorry.
They all say that a girl is lucky, that a handsome Einstein quits, that a girl is of course strong, and Einstein says, “God doesn’t roll the dice. I’m sorry.
“Dear Einstein, don’t command God for what he does. I’m sorry.
This was followed by a protracted debate over the famous “hidden variables” that Einstein’s classic physicists believed was “uncertainty” because many of the “hidden variables” were not found, and we call them “decision theory.”
One system, for example, has 10,000 variables, but humans have only 1,000, and there is certainly uncertainty, and the whole system will be determined by finding all the remaining 9,000 variables.
The Copenhagen school, represented by Boer, insists that “uncertainty” is the basic nature of things, let alone “randomism”.
Even if you’ve got 10,000 variables, you know all the variables, but the system is unpredictable.
The debate between “decision theory” and “random theory” has made “science” and “philosophism” a bit of a combination.
By the way, do you see the creepy meaning behind this? I started a little bit: assuming Einstein’s “decision theory” is in place, that is, if all the parameters of a system are fixed, the state of the next moment is fixed.
So considering the whole universe as a system, the state of the universe is determined by the state of the last moment, continues to push forward, until the moment of the Big Bang, or later, this moment is decided, this moment is decided at the last moment, you understand? Come on!
Of course, this “dependant theory” is not in any way compatible with human ethics, but it’s just like the “white horse” (the white horse is not a horse, the famous question of philosophical reasoning), which is unverified, so it never comes to a conclusion, so it’s darkening.
After decades of fighting, a cow named Bell, who proposed the “Bell Irresistance”, which is probably the first time that humans have tested a philosophical problem with a quantitative experiment and have to admire these fantastic physicists!
The final test results show that the “random theory” wins the “hidden variable”!
In other words, the world is “random” and no one has to worry about fate. And to remind you that Einstein is a failure party, so it’s not “right or wrong” to measure what a physicist means.
Interestingly, Einstein, in his response to Bol, put forward a paradox: does the collapse of a particle wave function lead to the collapse of another particle wave function in a entanglement?
Come on, I know you can’t read that sentence, but it’s common saying that there is a connection between multiple quantum systems, which is not limited by distance and time. For example, when a twin’s brother slaps, his brother at the far end of the world hurts, a message that is instantaneous and highly relativistic.
The concept of quantum entanglement has been put forward, and Einstein’s intent is to prove that Bolshoi can’t be trusted.
It’s sad to see a quantum entanglement! Einstein lost the game to Paul.
But it’s not over yet, and at Einstein’s 100th birthday event, Einstein’s colleague John Wheeler put forward the idea of “delaying the experiment” and once again challenged the Copenhagen school, represented by Paul.
Everybody get ready for this shit!
It’s not easy to tell without pictures.
There’s something called a half-pertroscope, and when the photons pass the half-pertroscope, they either go straight through, or they’re reflected, with a 50% probability.
The photon detector is then installed on the two paths of penetrating and reflecting, respectively, so that it can be seen whether the photon has been reflected. The results of the experiment are simple: the photons are either reflected or passed through the lens, with a 50% probability.
Now the problem is that, by taking these two paths together with a mirror and adjusting the phase, there’s an interferometry stripe, which means that the photon is both one and two, which means that this photon, which is both reflected and not reflected, is an absurd statement, but is consistent with the description of quantum mechanic probability waves.
The equivalent of a car arriving at its destination from both roads at the same time, was like a bilocation.
Where’s the weird thing?
If you don’t add this mirror to the back, the photon goes one way, you add this mirror, and the photon comes from both ways. It’s a hell of a thing. The way the observers look at the results of the experiment, it’s going to get worse!
In this regard, Wheeler has put forward a strange idea: without inserting the second mirror, when the photons have decided to go only one way and run halfway through the first half of the lens, and the second one has been inserted at once. So ask me, can the photons who have chosen to go one way at that point return to the other?
Wyler suggested “delay the experiment” and thought it would help Einstein get back to the game. A few years later, a group from Maryland University did a real “delayed experiment” that showed that the photons who had gone one way had gone two ways by inserting a second mirror.
This experiment looks intuitively like what’s happening can still be changed, and it’s like time goes back! This conclusion, of course, was unacceptable to anyone, and Boer gave an inexplicable explanation: Any basic quantum phenomenon is a phenomenon only after it has been recorded.
It reminds me of a story.
The wind blows the trees and the old monk asks, “What’s moving?” One of the little monks said, “The tree is moving,” and the other said, “The wind is moving,” and the old monk said, “The heart is moving.”
At first glance, it’s clearly ultimatumism!
But think about it, isn’t that delaying the experiment? The way the observers look at it determines the results. There’s a lot of similar theories in Buddhism, so physics has an interesting saying: when we try to climb the science peak, we find Buddhists waiting for us at the top of the mountain.
It was in this brainstorm that the physicists of the whole time gradually built a series of theoretical foundations of quantum mechanics. For every review of history, the wisdom and courage of the physicists of that age were greatly appreciated.
So, the physics building built since Newton collapsed.
What’s the weight of quantum mechanics?
It can be said that today’s technological development is still digesting quantum theory 100 years ago. Quantum mechanics has contributed to the explosive growth of human technology for 100 years, the biggest of which is a digital computer, and now there is finally a sign of fatigue.
Finally, I have to remind you that many of my classmates feel that this is not the case with quantum mechanics, but don’t forget the powerful mathematical explanations and clever experiments behind these theories.
Many of the “genocide scientists” who don’t know what math is, are attached to physics and don’t care about classic physics, relying only on front-line physical fanaticism, always relying on simple phenomena, using simple math, and proposing the theory of the sky and the sky to overthrow the most fundamental theory.
Is there anything else so cheap these days?
It’s a pity that theoretical physics is already a luxury, that doctorate is only an entry point, and that we are the only ones who can stand by and refuel!
Case number: YX11Q2zMgdM
I don’t know.
Keep your eyes on the road.
