How can it be most efficient to endorse it?
I’m Liu Qian, the champion of “Super Speaker” and I’ve prepared a judicial exam while I’m preparing “Super Speaker.”
I myself was a high school student of humanities, and you know it’s a lot of memory work, and I was able to carry a complete history book, a political book, a geography book, from the first to the third grade, a dozen books.
I remember one time when I went to a lecture at school, a freshman friend stood up and asked, “What am I supposed to do, sister? I’m sorry.
I said, “Can you put the catalogue of history books in order?” I’m sorry.
He said no. I said you can’t even repeat the catalogue. How can you learn from history?
When I was in high school, I met a very good history teacher, who told our classmates: “History books have to be carried down. You better have a little bit of it back, because you need history books to remember when you answer. I’m sorry.
The teacher only told us what to do, but I kept that in mind, and I started thinking about what to do.
When I wrote the whole book down, I found out I was on the run. I have emphasized that feeling on many occasions, that the test is closed, that my examination is open, and that I do things much faster than I do.
Because I’ve got a whole book in my head, and that’s the kind of knowledge that makes you fall in love with the exam, and you think it’s too good and too little.
And then I went on to the other subject, and I found that memory was really the foundation of all the disciplines, and we had just said that the literature needed to remember something, but it was a job to learn chemistry, physics, mathematics, and finally, basically memory, and you saw it, and you knew there were five solutions, using three formulas, all of them in your head.
So I said, as long as you know how to write things, the exams will be fine.
When I was in high school, I was dealing with all the tests with this restatement of memory, but at that time, it was just a primary model.
And then I went to college and I studied, and I made it up, and I’ve been very good at it, because it’s a memory job, and you can score as much as you can.
I can rephrase the whole book in its entirety, and then you can just pick a subheading. I can tell you what’s under the subheading.
And then to the judicial exam, I had a very short period of time, because at that time, in the same year as the competition speaker, the speaker and the judicial exam, the speaker was in July, September, but the winner, when I had a lot of other offers, I was on the phone every day, and then I had a hard-on who took the judicial exam.
On the one hand, the restatement of memory was very mature at that time, and on the other hand, after more than a year, I remember nothing.
This is the recapitulation of memory, in which I myself have largely not used any other memory, photography, photographic memory, memory palaces, ideas, stories, etc.
And I don’t suggest that you use these memories in your daily lives and learning, unless you’re going to some kind of brain race, round-trip contest.
It’s also smooth, because, as a teaching material, it can’t be such a mess that since these materials have their own logic, they are not a bunch of meaningless, logical numbers, or anything else, you don’t have to think about it, add a story, and most memories teach you to add logic to disorderly materials, and then write them down so that you can remember them so well.
For example, you’re going to put something in your back in the palace, or you’re going to imagine the material, you’re going to write it a story, or you’re going to write it with a tune, and that’s going to break the logic of the original material and increase your memory.
I was very afraid that the logic of what I wanted to remember would be destroyed, and then the sequence of long-term memories in my brain would be disturbed, so I wouldn’t use any other memory, and I don’t think these methods are practical.
Plus, we’re gonna remember too much, a dozen books, and you said how many tunes and stories you’re gonna write to write it down.
So I think that, except in a few cases, I’m going to use these memories to remember something that’s harder to remember.
First step, comb. It’s common to say that it’s about making it look better.
Second step, repeat. Repeat it out, make sure the back goes.
Third step, memory. You have to remember it sometime to prevent it.
When many remember, there is only a second step, without combing and remembering, forgetting and saying that they have a bad memory.
The combing part is divided into three additional steps: the first, divided; the second, wired; the third, fixed.
To take a case-by-case example of how these three steps should be used, for example, a piece of our law called the “reasonable use of copyright”.
For example, I wrote a book, I’m copyrighted, I draw a painting, I write a book, no one can steal it, no one can use it because I have copyright.
We call it the rational use of copyright, so normally, you cannot use, sell, sell, when you can use it, and it is reasonable that no one will sue you.
The Copyright Act provides for a total of 12 reasonable uses:
First, the individual learns to study or appreciates the use of works already published by others.
Second, for the purpose of commenting on a work or describing an issue, it is appropriate to refer in the work to the work already published by others.
Thirdly, in order to cover current affairs, published works are inevitably reproduced or quoted in the media, such as radio and television stations in newspapers and periodicals.
Fourth, media such as newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, television stations, etc. have been published, or other newspapers, periodicals, radio stations, television stations, etc. have been published, with the exception of current articles on political, economic, religious issues, which the authors have declared inadmissible.
Fifthly, speeches made at public gatherings are published or broadcast in the media, such as newspapers, periodicals, radio stations and television stations, with the exception of the author ‘ s statement that they are not allowed to be published.
I don’t know.
I read here, believe everyone’s faint. How should we remember? How do you remember something so faint? Maybe you’re stupid to see that. What do we do?
Don’t come up like I said, don’t come up like I did.
The first one, one to five, for example, can be divided into one, just reading a bunch of one to five, basically, you learn, and when you’re going to comment, you might have to quote someone else’s article.
I’d like to comment on the article by Han Yong, and I’d like to quote his article, your own studies, your comments and your reports, which you can use rationally, not your infringement of his writing rights, so one to five split into one.
Between 6 and 7 can be divided into two groups, since between 6 and 7 can be used when the school is to be taught, or when State authorities are to perform official duties, or can be reasonable.
Eight, nine, ten can count. This is mainly about our collections, our performances, but it’s free, or we’re going to paint. You’re a very good sculpture. Can I draw it? Not really, so I put it in this one, which is in relation to the collection, the painting and the performance.
And finally 11 and 12 is that if you translate this into minority languages or Braille, it doesn’t count, so 11 and 12 are part of the public good.
This 12 points can be divided into four, and when you’re done, your memory drops down to one quarter.
Of course it’s not just this one, but you can divide 1, 2 and 6 and 7 into one, because it says I use it myself, study it, study it, enjoy it, or the State, the school, it’s not an invasion, you can divide it into individuals, schools, the State, this is a piece.
It’s not necessarily the same way, you can split it in your own way, and when you divide it, your memory drops, and you might have to remember 12 points, and you can only go 4 points now, and 4 points is easier than 12 points.
I’ll share with you three ways:
So the three methods of the division, by comparison, by the same attribute and by logic, are then separated from the material you need to prepare.
I remember this way when I was speaking, when we were going from writing to actually coming on stage, with only two or three days in between, two or three days already, and your manuscripts were usually finalized on the first day of the event.
And I can’t fix it, because I’m going to change it, and I’m going to change it if I think it’s not good, and I’m going to change it until the last minute before I go on stage, and I’m going to change it.
How am I supposed to write this article, you know it’s scary to forget words from the podium, and it’s not like this has not happened, and it’s true that there are players who forget words.
When I remember this thing, I think of it in my head, like my last piece called “The Gentleman” , which is divided into three pieces: the first, I was thinking about my childhood experience, starting with me; the second, I can’t just talk about myself, I have to talk about the British documentary, so I can believe what I’m saying; and the third, I have to turn around, I can’t tell you this about it, and the last part I want to inspire you.
This three, and all I have to do is write down the three pieces in my head, and on stage, even if I don’t remember the words, I think I’m going to say something about the next one, so the pressure is much smaller.
Then there’s a problem. You split this up, but there’s more in each piece. How do you remember that?
The job is to help us connect all the content, like a line, so that you can remember the second, the second, the third, and the most important part of the whole memory work is to go through the wire, to get to the point you need to go back and to organize them.
It’s a process that follows a bunch of messy lines, and you sort it out first, and you sort it out, or you find something to wear them, and it’s easier to remember.
If you don’t organize, it’s hard to remember all kinds of things, so wired can help you to efficiently transform short-term memories into long-term ones and never forget them.
So how do we organize, wear, and connect what we need to carry? The following methods:
For example, a body of legal, political knowledge, which is in itself a knowledge of the real world, is in itself reasonable, and no one will let you carry something that is messy and logical, so you need to understand it in the context of common sense, in the context of bottom logic, so that not only will your memory be reduced, but it is likely that you will not have to remember it.
If you particularly understand this, you think it should be. That’s what you think. What do you say on the book? Nope.
I’ve often had the feeling, when I was endorsing it, that it’s an analysis, and I think this man is particularly right, and the author of this book is particularly right, and I think it’s very right, and I say the same thing.
And when I remember, I remember a thing that was supposed to be, so you must understand from the bottom.
Perhaps what I just said was a little abstract, and I’ll give you an example of a term in the law called “the subrogation of creditors” that sounds rather lame, if not law.
The creditor’s subrogation means, for example, that you owe me money, that he owes you money, that you don’t want it, that you don’t want it, and that way my interests will be compromised, so I’ll take your place and I’ll ask him.
Me, you, him, in the triad, I’ll take your place and ask you for money, so I’ll ask the creditors to take their place. Since I am a creditor, you are a debtor, and he is your debtor, this is called the creditor’s subrogation, so you’re going to have a good time.
But he doesn’t owe me money. How can I ask for it? The law protects you, you can apply to the court, you say he owes him money, he owes me money, he doesn’t pay him, so he can’t pay me back, so the court can help me get it from him who owes me money.
But under what conditions would the court support you, that is, what are the conditions for the creation of creditor subrogation?
First, the first point is that the creditor’s claim to the debtor is legal and mature, that is, the money you owe me is legal and has expired, so I can ask.
Secondly, the debtor has a claim to a third person, and the claim is due, because the money he owes you is due, so you can go and ask him. If he doesn’t, I’ll ask him. He won’t pay. He says I owe him. Why did you come to me for it?
And the third thing is, you don’t go to him and you’re hurting my rights, you can’t pay me back, but if you don’t, you have $10 million, you can give me back, and I don’t have the right to do that for you.
Fourth, the debtor’s relationship with third parties is non-exclusive and enforceable. At this point, you need to understand what non-exclusive rights are and what rights are enforceable.
For example, the money that this man was hit by a car, and then the money that this man owed him to treat his body, which could be in this category, you can’t ask for it, you can’t have the right to take it.
These are the four points of the creditor’s subrogation, and you’ll find these four points, each of which is logical, each of which is logical, and when you remember, the memory is not that big.
It’s not just the law, it’s political and economic in particular, it’s every one of its own principles, you understand.
So, first of all, what we have to do is to understand from the bottom logic.
The expression between people is different, and it is better to remember the expression of others.
For example, some people speak for reasons, then for results, but perhaps I like to say results, then for reasons.
When we’re going to carry something, the memory of a class is that I can use my words to make it clear and clear. The memory of the second class is that I can use your words to make this thing clear, and I can write it down in the same way as the book is.
How can we remember the logic of other people’s expressions? We would like to endorse the logic of recitation, and we need to know in what order it is stated. As a general rule, these materials are not false and have their own logic.
I would like to give you an example of the fact that the political books must contain the subject of what the basic economic system of the early stages of socialism is, in itself, a socialist State, so we have to uphold the foundations of public ownership. The second point is that we are not well developed and uneven, so we need to develop a diverse ownership economy. Last but not least, everything that fits three advantages should be used in the service of socialism.
You will find these three points in the order in which it speaks, and perhaps I will not say them in that order, but I will not say them in that order, but I will carry them on my back, so I will keep them in that order.
What is the logic of its expression, first, that we are socialist States, so we want public ownership; then, in his complementary words, that we are underdeveloped, unbalanced and realistic, and that we need multiple ownership.
I don’t know if I’ve made myself clear, but I believe that everyone sees these three things, and that’s the logic of their expression, so you have to agree to them. Don’t think about what I’m saying. You can’t say the third point when you want me to say it.
So I usually look at this, and that’s how it’s expressed in this book, and that’s what it’s in, and then I’m going to endorse it, and then I’m going to say that I follow that order, and that’s the easiest time to go back.
But the third thing we have to say is that there are things that really have no logic, no logic at all.
You have to create a logic that you can think about and understand, taking into account your own practical experience.
There’s a lot of material, and when I write it, I find that I don’t know who did it, that the person who wrote this book is not clear, or that I don’t understand it, and that there are places where I do feel logically problematic, that is, it doesn’t seem right.
What if I can’t remember three? What I do to my children, or what I do to my loved ones, is to respect her, to obey her, to protect her, right?
So when you combine people and things that you know better, it’s easier to remember, without logic.
Of course, you can also use stories, memories, easy words, which are used at this time, and only when there is no logic.
So at this point, you don’t have to put this in, you can just take it as a special case, that’s all.
That is what we are talking about: legal, political, economic, historical.
I’ve been studying these subjects over the years, and 90 percent of all the things that I’ve worked on have logic to look for, and I can wear this line, so basically after school, you’ll be able to remember.
Why is it hard for some people to read their speeches and why do others forget their words as soon as they get on stage?
Because his speech is not logical, it’s too bad to wear the line, so it stops there, and it doesn’t work.
I can’t say how good my manuscript is, but my manuscript must have that line, and I know I’m going to wear it on my back, and I’m going to do it on my back, so I won’t forget the words.
“The Rational Use of Copyright,” I divided it into four pieces, each of which was a keyword in my heart, and then each of them was a keyword.
For example, from point 1 to point 5, I condensed it into three keywords: learning, commentary, reporting, three key words, five points in one.
These keywords replace the original mass, and the memory changes, and you can mark them with fluorescent pens when you write things, which is better.
When I went to the speech contest, there was a picture in the brain of my work, first of all, in the section of my brain, and then there was a logical line, and finally, there was something glowing and there was a key word.
For example, my first key word, “Our Home”, I said, I started with our home, and there was a key word, “documentary” , which flashed like I used a fluorescent pen to mark it in real life, and that’s what I do when I’m in a real life. There’s a lot of words, and that’s where that point starts, and then you’ll remember it, and that line comes out.
Anyway, in this way, you’ll find it might be a little slow at the beginning, because people come up and you come up and you comb, but you’re going to be quicker and you’re going to forget very little.
Even if you forget, you just see one of the dots, you see one of the lines, you see one of the pieces, you think of all of them, because in your heart, the book finally becomes a network, one that has a piece, a line, a bit, very hard to forget.
That is the part of the comb that we are talking about, and when we’re done with it, we basically remember more than half of what we need to remember.
So it’s called a narrative, and I’m here to propose a concept called never endorsement.
I don’t understand why you’re signing up for someone whose back is so painful.
For example, a friend told you something, saying, “I’ll tell you three points today, first, second, third… and then you’ll tell the next person.” I’m sorry.
Will you tell your friend that I can’t tell you until I have 10 minutes on my back? Nope.
Because what your friends say is reasonable, logical, and logical, so you don’t say it, so let me remember it ten times and repeat it.
But when we learn things, it’s like we’re a robot, and we’re just like robots, and you don’t know and understand anything.
So many times, your first step went wrong, you didn’t understand it from the bottom logic, you didn’t do it, you didn’t do it, you didn’t do it, you didn’t do it, and you did it back like a robot.
And yet our brains, not robotic brains, can’t remember so much, and it can cause a mess.
So I’m telling you, there’s never been a back story in the restatement of memory, and you really understand one thing, and you can talk about it, so you don’t have to hang on to it, you really learn to understand it, and you do it, and you can do it in order, and you don’t have to back it so hard.
My history books, my law books, I didn’t carry them, I told them. That’s my stuff. I know it.
I’ve fully understood what I’m going to carry, and I’ve understood the order, I’ve been wired, I’ve got words, I’m organized, I’m telling you now.
I’m just telling you something I know, so it’s not called endorsement at all, and I don’t talk to people like that many times. I don’t. I might stop. I might think about it a little, but it never happens.
Because putting the book down is like doing a memory test, and it’s only then that you know if your back is there.
So first, all things that need to be remembered must be written down, and there is no time to read them.
I suggest you all have a sense of ritual, that you put the book down and then you stand on the podium of the classroom, or you stand under a tree outside, wherever you want, and you tell yourself.” I have learned a little something today, I have learned a few things about the rational use of copyright, and now I have been asked, and I want to tell him that I want to talk to you. I’m sorry.
So you have to have a sense of ritual, and you have to talk to people about rituals, and you don’t talk to people about endorsements. You don’t talk to people about what’s going on, you can break between you, but you can’t feel backs.
The first thing is to start from scratch, not from here, but from the beginning. When you remember point five, you don’t remember point six, you don’t remember point six, you start with point one.
The second thing, where you broke it, took a pen and looped it down, which proves that it’s called a break point, and you’re going to record this break point, and you’re going to have to prove that your brain isn’t working at this time, and you’re going to be able to walk, so you’re going to have this problem at the test, and you’re probably going to have to do it. This breakpoint, you have to write down, and you don’t go straight to point six. You have to follow it down from the beginning to the end, so you can get it on.
So when we repeat, if we forget, we start from scratch, and we record breakpoints, special memories.
After this, you’re going to learn this thing, this thing you’re going to carry, this thing that’s yours, not in the book, since it’s yours, you can say it anytime.
These are the first two steps in the restatement of memory, the first called combo and the second called repetition.
I’m talking about the benefits of restatement, and I’m really sharing it with you, and I feel the benefits are too great.
The first benefit is that your ability to express is stronger, that you speak more logically, because the order and logic of your endorsement have been in training for 10 years, I’ve tested for 10 years, I’ve carried back 10 years, and my expression logic is divided and fixed every day, looking at the logic, the order, and then telling it. I’ve been doing this every day, so I think it’s too much of an expression, and it’s the way you write it, and it makes you more expressive.
The second advantage is to deepen understanding, because the world itself has a learning method called Feynman Learning, and one of the things that you have to tell people about is that if you have a problem with it, you go and look at it and read it.
It’s a very good way to learn, that is, to speak to others, if I have to repeat it after I’m back, and to speak to others.
The third benefit is that your ears, mouth and body learn together. Every time I sign up, I find a kiosk and a tree, and I stand there, and I say, “I’ll tell you what is a repetition of memory, and I’ll divide it into these three…
I followed the gestures, my mouth followed, my ears followed, I didn’t lose my mind. You sit there and you don’t say anything, and you’ll be drawn away by something else.
Because the endorsement can stop at any moment, it’s not the same thing, and I’ve made the first, second, and second steps, and you won’t let me write the third, the fourth, and I don’t think it’s that.
However, endorsements can be stopped at any time, can be interrupted at any time and can be withheld at any time. It is difficult to focus on endorsements, which are the biggest problem we adults recite.
So restatement of memory allows people to learn their ears, their mouths and their bodies in order to avoid distractions.
And down, there’s another good thing about it, that you’re going to get more and more interested. First, you have a strong sense of accomplishment, and you’re particularly happy and happy when you recapitulate it in its entirety; second, expression is a natural desire, and you’ve been doing something that releases your expression, and you’re very happy when you’re done, so it’s going to be fun to endorse it.
And finally, of course, it’s a very efficient way of remembering, because if you normally remember, you don’t know how you remember yourself, and you don’t know if you can write it down on the examination and write it in our way, but if you’ve said it, repeated it, and repeated it more than once, you won’t forget it, because you know exactly those memories and break points, so there won’t be a break.
That is the benefit of the repetition of memory that we have shared with you, and hopefully it can help everyone.
How can it be most efficient to endorse it? – The response recommended by the salt selection.
I don’t know.
Keep your eyes on the road.
