That’s how I did it, in the third year of high school, from the last 2nd in class to the second in the positive, during which the rankings were only up and down and went up 85 points.
In the first semester of my senior year, my performance was as follows:
Languages: 105 or about 120
Mathematics: Steady at 140+, 150, no surprise.
English: 110 around 130
Synopsis: 190 around 240 around
Note that the above is a term change.
The second semester was higher, and I felt that I had not experienced a bottleneck.
Doesn’t it seem easy to people?
Language English is mathematically comprehensive, but it is a few points apart, especially for those who perform better in their own right.
But don’t think it’s too hard.
It is not necessary to get up early in the dark and get into trouble to achieve good results.
The “quality” of efforts is more important than the “quantity” of time and practice.
The main components are as follows:
1. Remembering the law before sleeping
2. Writing
3. Languages
4. English
5 Math
Political
History
8. Geography
I think it’s common to know how to raise points. In a cheesy summation, it’s the answer to the question: “Back-and-for-all.”
First one’s the worst, first one’s the dry stuff.
First, a generic approach, then a subject-specific analysis, with the exception of anecdotal approaches, while ensuring that recruitment is applicable.
General principle: no one’s going to do it without the sea tactics.
It must be done, and only in the process of making a mistake would it be possible to find its own short board.
However, it is absolutely impossible to pursue the sense of enrichment brought about by blind brushing, and to do it all day long, without an anti-nursing process, it would be better to forget one than to sleep and play a game of fiction.
1. A common method for any discipline – the pre-night memory
Don ‘ t think that once and for all, all the things that have been done, especially those that have been wrong, lie in bed before sleeping that night, and remember them carefully.
It is not just a recollection of the knowledge point of the subject, but of the state of the subject, the reasons why it was wrong, the options of the struggle, etc.
Why do you have to think in bed?
Because at this point you don’t have any learning materials around you, you don’t want to read books.
It’s possible to do this in the last 10 minutes of late self-study if you can hold on to it.
When you experience it, you find it a painful process.
Because there’s a lot of questions to do and a lot of knowledge to learn in the day, it’s possible to start to think about it in the first place, and it’s even like, “How am I supposed to cook when I’ve learned it in the day?” “It’s frustrating.
But that is the beginning of progress.
80% of the knowledge you can remember before you go to sleep will never be forgotten.
The knowledge that you can’t remember is the best thing to remember, or the more skillful, and then the next day you re-open the information and the notebook with a little bit of doubt, so you can remember and get it.
Every ten and a half days, it’s hard to forget. Much more than the initial incompetence, the learning efficiency has slowly increased.
After all, this process is the daily summary of the upgrade.
And I was in the trial class, and the degree of the work of my fellow students was self-evident.
A large percentage of the students in the class are eating some of the 5-3s as thick as bricks all day, and the final improvement is not ideal, or even much more so than keeping the ranking stable.
I’ve tried to brush like these kids. But the plan was put on hold for three days.
Why?
Because after those questions, I feel like I’m not feeling well.
The wrong question doesn’t remember what’s wrong.
Undeniably, the brush is good. It can train a person to do an intuitive thing so that you can think the right way in the exam.
This process, however, is very long and does not apply to short-term points for ordinary students.
So, the skills and good learning habits are most important.
Learning is an ongoing process of output and input.
The skills and ideas of any discipline deserve to be reflected, summarized and remembered.
In the end, it is possible to really understand and understand, and in fact, all the questions of the High Tests can be changed, and it’s no problem.
2. Impressions: About writing
Good writing is more important, especially in the arts. But what if it’s not good?
We can start with the layout.
First, words cannot be written next to a box, leaving room for half to one word around them.
Don’t underestimate the point, the top and the surroundings are printed in the script, and the results are scanned and presented in the computer, which is more impressive than the former.
Second, look at the space between each word. If you don’t say every word, it’s a high-end atmosphere.
Finally, on the subject of mathematics, the logic is clear and the work is done.
The following subject-specific analysis:
1. Languages:
I spent three years in high school, and the language went up and down from 105 to 120.
Personally observed that language should be the most stable discipline for the vast majority of people and that there was very little space to raise points, so it was placed in a relatively secondary position.
Actually not.
Language is indeed a review of the composite capacity, but the ubiquitous approach is no exception.
Let’s talk about the teacher. The language teacher’s influence on student achievement is really too great.
The degree of professionalism of the teacher, and the day-to-day expression of the teacher, have an impact on the overall linguistic literacy of the student.
I was asked, what about teachers?
We can use online classes.
It’s almost the time of web3.0.
The online teachers who are now able to go to the market are still very good, and they can screen for themselves, and now they are very mature in small programs, cards, community questions, job modification, etc.
However, it is absolutely not enough to listen to online classes, and nothing is more feared than having heard, seen or studied carefully.
Take the example of language.
Everyone has to face the problem of “life and death” — how do you learn to do more?
Quite ambiguous knowledge points are encountered, and teachers are able to speak out and listen to them, but they cannot follow their rhythm completely.
We have to go ahead and take the initiative.
If you really don’t know the subject, then you can quietly rephrase the logic of the subject and figure out where you’re losing points.
Think about it. Why would I miss that? Why can’t one of my answers count? What’s the gap between me and the answer?
After thinking, you can find your weaknesses more precisely.
When the teacher talks, we mark. As long as you think that the teacher has made the key things clear, the idea of the subject is clear and your ears are raised and your mind is written by the title.
Outside of the classroom, please do your part to do your part, so that it is easy and easy.
Well, after the teacher, let’s take a look at the subject.
First, the choice of the subject is based on basic knowledge. It’s like words, wrong words, sick sentences, literature.
These are special “dead” questions. They can do it, they can’t do it, they can’t do it.
In the face of such topics, it is believed that no one dares to brag.
It’s not like I don’t have to do it. It has to be done, but not as much as possible.
The score of words, miswords, literary common sense may depend on the basis of the individual, but I think the disease can be eaten down.
In fact, there are only a few ways out, first to know what the pits are, then to drug and practice. And here’s a little pamphlet for you.
Selective training will have no immediate effect, and there will certainly be a process in the middle where the hit rate is too high, and it is normal, and it means that you are on the way to progress, and you insist on winning.
Read the question. Answer the questions in two or three; there should be logic between the three points and a parallel line could be made, and progress would be better.
Every point of the response (for the big questions) is basically a view + analysis + summary.
As for how to be logical and sound, please study the standard answer! Look at the standard answer!
It is not only an analysis of where the score points come from, but also an analysis of the logical layers and terms between statements.
In particular, in previous years, the question of how many words to write is the most appropriate to leave one third of the line in the last line, and if there is no line, try to fill it and adjust the line for itself.
Language reading does not recommend a sprawl, as the logical second line of command is most important because of the greater number of subject parts and the lower priority given to language subjects.
About words. Scribbling, scribbling, like sick words, words, etc., is important, and you have to shout out your voice when you read.
There is more to it, more to it, more to it, less to it, but to insist will be effective.
It is important to summarize the text after a few pages have been completed, or a week later.
A good sum-up would be an encouragement; a bad sum-up would be more important, and lessons learned would be expected next time.
Once the subject has been revisited, a teaching aid for language and language training will be produced, linking the subject to theoretical considerations, which will provide a clear understanding of the text at the macro level.
About the essay. I don’t really like writing. I don’t read much extra-curricular books from childhood. It’s only 38 for the third year, but by the second semester of the third year, it’ll be around 48.
It’s just a dissertation. To measure the quality of an essay, there are two core elements: logic + text.
Whatever the basis, many people have had problems with logic.
The general argument is that there is a layer of progress and that there is no parallel.
It may be written that the first split is about the country, the second is about the family, and the third is about the individual, the subject from the big to the small, which is not in accordance with the rules of the examination.
Moreover, several arguments are not at all at one level.
It’s not always practiced, but you can practice the subject and the argument.
In the next few days, the logic and purpose of reading the subject, drawing up the title, writing the points, thinking about how to write and talking to the teacher. The whole process will not exceed 20 minutes.
Logic’s settled. Where’s Vince?
He forced himself to read the literature, and to write the essays and materials of the High Court, and to take notes of the novelty, his favorite words.
It doesn’t matter to remember a few good words, not too much, three or four pages, and then to do an output of knowledge, to use them over and over again. It doesn’t matter what you wrote last time.
It’s very practical to recommend this book, which has a lot of particularly fresh material.
Of course, the subject of the sentence usually needs to be converted, and there are good sentences on your notebooks that don’t happen.
If higher levels are to be pursued, it is necessary to work at the beginning and at the end. The importance of the beginning and end must have been expressed by many language teachers.
This is a test exercise, and the key is to write the initial and final words of the outline.
You can put that training together at the beginning and at the end of the exercise, and you can look at it, and you can do it.
2. English
I’m probably going from about 110 to 125+.
Mine clearance first is not an ideal role for the vast majority of students.
And the end result is that a word begins several times, and the word starts without turning over.
There are booklets with words, pronunciations and no examples, which are almost useless.
Because the words of light are very hard to remember and are quickly forgotten, they absolutely need to be written in context.
For example, when I learned the word “monitor,” I joked with the captain: “How does the captain read it?” After asking several times, she found out that I was joking, that I had a few eyes, and that’s what this word means. This is life.
However, most of the memories of words are done on our own, so they must be included in the sentence.
Not to ask you to recite it in silence, but to read it at least a few times. The sentence is also reviewed every time it is reviewed, which also enhances speech and grammar.
When you remember a word, if you can remember the special context in which you learned that word, that’s really great.
There are many ways of remembering words that are now popular on the market, but I don’t think it’s realistic for a senior.
In fact, you’ve only got back to the words on the textbook, 115 plus absolutely steady.
And then, you know, it’s kind of like, you know, it’s kind of like, you know, it’s like, you know, it’s kind of like, you know, it’s kind of like, you know, it’s kind of like, you know, it’s kind of, you know, you know, it’s kind of, you know, it’s kind of, you know, it’s kind of kind of, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, it’s kind of kind of, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, it’s kind of like, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you’re kind of kind of kind of kind of kind of kind of kind of kind of kind of kind of kind of kind of like, you, you, you, you, you know, uh, you, you, you, you, uh,
Using sporadic time memory to read at least three words a day, at least three times a day, with appropriate contact root.
Words based on the root of words are really useful, faster than the unsequenced memory method, but we barely have time to learn systematically, so we can’t feel their strength.
Now that you don’t buy a word book, where should it be written?
Preferred information: teaching materials.
In order to keep pace with the course, the high school texts are sometimes not fully taught, but the latter are taught by the teacher.
So you can read and understand when you read the text.
Second, to accumulate the words of practice that are normally done.
Not all living words should be copied on notebooks. There are a few principles: less monologues, more verbs, more adjectives! In particular, the key words that influence the score of reading titles.
In order to strengthen the memory, please keep the words in your head, reverse them, muzzle them and change them. If you encounter them in the examination, you will be able to do more.
About hearing.
When I was in high school, Monday through Friday evenings schools would have a unified English hearing on the radio, with the same English hearing book for the whole grade and training together. This training is characterized by the fact that the audio does not allow people to listen, and it ends when it is heard.
But that doesn’t mean we should cover it.
When the hearing on the radio was over, a lot of kids were right. ABCD was closed, but did you think about the wrong questions? Do you know where you’re not listening to the answers without looking at them?
The answer is no.
So when the hearing is over, don’t rush to see what the answer is, but the original.
When you look and mark the key words that are relevant to the subject, you can still remember what it’s like to be hearing.
Think about the wrong question. Which one is fast? Or is there a word for it? Or did you lose your mind?
You must be able to see your problems in these few minutes of reading the original text, so you can look at yourself.
It’s easier if it’s a schoolmate. Upon return at night, take out the hearing book and download the audio into the cell phone and train yourself. For the first time, no matter how mean you are, please just keep listening to it! Then, in accordance with the steps above, the original text, the interpretation of the original text, the correctness, and then the ABC.
The most important part comes.
Once the exact location of the error was identified, the progress strips of the audio were constantly adjusted with the mobile phone, and they were repeated.
Listening back and forth, listening hard, listening hard, listening fast.
A few words could be a few seconds, and you’ll hear every word three or five times.
Let’s hear the words, pick the weekends and do the whole ear.
There’s really no time to do it again, and you can do it with an earpiece.
That’s what I call a hearing.
Hold on for a month, the hearing will be a qualitative leap.
Most of the words in the hearing are easy, and if they are not well-founded and cannot keep up with the amount of words, they have to be put to work.
The process of reading the original language is also training in reading skills.
In fact, all parts of the English-language examination are interoperable, and it would be helpful if one of them was done. For a good-looking student, you can practice at 1.2 times the speed of your own training, except for training with everyone.
The hearing part goes on to say that many people listen easily, and attitudes can even be described as negative and scattered.
I understand the inexplicable pain, but anxiety does not solve the problem and action is the only way.
It is therefore necessary to learn to get out of its comfort zone, to force itself to concentrate, not to say nervous, or at least not to be influenced by ordinary outside winds.
About reading. People prefer to read the subject first, not the option, which generally gives them a basic sense of direction, and then read the text less easily.
After a second reading, a cross-reference was made to the question, where the answer to the question appeared in the article, so that it was easy to check and, if wrong, to answer the question and to reflect on the logic of the subject.
In English.
Of course, it’s just like writing.
More advanced sentences, more advanced adverbs, appropriate replacements for commonly used verbs, forcing yourself to use them in normal practice and to remember them several times.
Attention, the back alone is useless and forced to use it.
How many high-level sentences and vocabulary do you think you teach?
It’s just no habit, no use.
So, when you practice writing in English, you open your notebook, see which of the words and the upper words you use, and when you’re born, you get it up.
As long as there are no large-scale grammatical errors, the 25-point text should have a good 16-18.
It’s a good time to go to bed with a good backback exercise.
Follow the teacher’s rhythm, the back, the silent.
English language learning is a growing experience, and it is important to have more skills in the field.
No matter how low the starting point, you can’t be broken. You can do it.
3 Math
The students of literature should listen to the phrase: “The Mathematicians have the world.” There is no doubt that mathematics is the head of the third cycle and, for the vast majority of people, the hardest part.
At the very beginning, my proposal is to be realistic.
What I’m talking about is a clear understanding of the mathematical level and the structure of the paper.
Mathematics has 12 choice questions, 4 empty questions and 6 big questions, of course there may be a problem-oriented adjustment.
It is well known that there is a clear distinction between the ease of the subject.
Assumptions A’s grades are hovering around 60 cents, so how does he get up?
Let’s start with the 60-point concept.
The selection is made for 4 lines (4 x 5 = 20 minutes), the filling of 2 lines (2 x 5 = 10 minutes), the following 6 major lines, the first 4 questions (4 x 6 = 24 minutes), together equals 54 points, which is about 60 points.
After a careful analysis of the A’s fraction composition, we should do something about it.
A is a level at which only two-to-one basic questions can be made, and even a part of the basic questions cannot be added to the list, and the basic questions make up the majority of options, fill in blank questions, and then try to take the simplest big questions and do the other big questions first, do these things well, and do the theoretical results go up 15-20 points or more?
Once the direction of learning is clear, it will be time to see how it works.
The order of the points in the mathematical papers is generally the same, for example, the first is a cluster, the last is a spin-off, the penultimate is a geometry, etc.
First of all, A needs to find the most unstable of its own scores, assuming that A’s numbers are wrong every time.
Well, he needs to spend at least five days dedicated to the basics of the column.
Remember, all the time spent on mathematics is spent on numbering questions, except for the work done by the teacher.
Five days in a row, that’s almost five to ten minutes.
The same approach applies to all people and all knowledge points. First, the knowledge points and the question-and-choices to be addressed are clearly identified and then kept on going. It’s a process from quantum to mass.
But math learning has bottlenecks.
The harder you challenge, the more time you spend, the harder it will be for good people with good math to get up to a higher level, the harder it will be for poor students.
If you are aware of yourself to a certain extent, some of the issues will not be broken in any way, or you will not achieve their goal in any way.
It’s not a good idea to turn to another one, if you’ve made a sustained effort to do so.
Moreover, it does not matter that you have not reached the expected score, and it is not easy to maintain stability on the basis of the progress you have made.
Moreover, what we are pursuing is progress in overall scores, looking at all subjects, with a big picture, with bad math, and not as a whole, as long as other subjects go through?
Mathematics, not only is there progress in knowledge, but the mindset is very stable.
150 points, you learn 120 points, and you’re going to have to put that 120 in full, and you’re going to do it without care or effort.
And, hopefully, a lot of people who hate math can reconcile with it.
Because it’s an inevitable thing, the more insurgencies you get, the more you look up to it.
Not to fall in love with the subject, not to hate, but to be ordinary.
Mathematics has stabilized at 125+ students, and in order to make a breakthrough, please focus on the geometrical analysis.
Every day, one big geometrical thing, three days of a function numeric question, spends more time thinking, summing up, and it works.
Some classmates may be more interested in the function guide, so can we put the analysis geometry in a secondary position?
No way.
All the students who have studied mathematics in Osei can’t guarantee a 100% success in the function guide.
For Olympians, 125+ mathematics is his first grade, let alone his number.
Because a function conductor can often combine probabilistic and numerical questions, as long as you touch it, the second question is 90%, and you can’t use a pen.
Unless you feel like you have a human talent in the function, focus on the geometry.
It’s a lot of trouble to recommend a set of simulators for students with particularly good grades in mathematics (about 135 points).
But it doesn’t matter, it’s hard to get used to it.
4. Political
Most of the students who study this subject are able to follow their teachers to the core of the book and the classic paragraphs.
The knowledge structure and logic of the four teaching materials were similar once the three-round review had been completed.
But why can’t someone make a big deal without touching it?
The crux of the examination tends to be the hottest of times, and the standard answer to the subject is that a significant part of the point is that we haven’t gone back in our previous studies.
But you’ve seen it and you’ve known each other. Or does it seem more common, but you haven’t?
Teacher always asks everyone to read the material carefully, to say the word, why do others score points while you sometimes take the edge of the sword?
To deal with the big issues, I would like to make two recommendations:
(1) Spelling, starting with the words of teaching materials;
(2) The preparation of a small book, which is dedicated to the accumulation of advanced expressions not found in the teaching materials.
Start with the first point.
Why do you use the words of teaching materials?
We need to believe in the professionalism of the experts who produce the teaching materials, and the high-level examiners must have followed them.
Can you pick out something that’s not so important when you look at it?
Not only can it not be picked out, but there is also a logic between each sentence, a layer of progress and every word has a purpose.
In the course of careful learning, you are training your own mind to keep your mind as close as possible to the experts who make the problems.
And not only that, but in the process, you can also find the thought and professional expression that are often overlooked.
Take an example.
Four must be changed, and in the case of the epithesis, it is said that practice is the driving force for development.
Many of our classmates used it as a point of view for practical decisions.
How many people have noticed how the book explains this?
If you don’t notice, turn yourself over. There should be three small arguments.
I remember better, because I was so impressed.
Within a few years of the beginning of the third year of high school, there was a philosophical question, and one of the points was one of the arguments that “practical is the driving force for development,” when almost no one in the class answered, and the teacher took us for a long time to reflect on himself.
If you can answer that, isn’t that where you keep your distance from people?
The above examples are more typical and may be of interest to many.
Individuals feel that this approach works best in economic life. In particular, the book concludes with people who are innovative in entrepreneurship and technology.
About how to do the notebook.
First of all, you can cut down the very classics you’ve done and put them on your book, and look at them from time to time.
It’s not easy to cut, but to write down the new, professional expressions that appear in the standard answers.
Even if it means the same thing, if you express it more professionally than anyone else, the taste of the paper teacher will surely rise.
Of course, it is also important to keep up with the hot spots.
However, as a top three party, which sits in the classroom and reads hard, the task of paying attention to the news is entrusted to the teacher. New professional terms and so on.
The notebook has to be flipped.
The work of teaching materials should begin now. Follow the rhythm of the teacher ‘ s re-study, and some of the previous books were put on the table before they could be read, with a few weekends to make up.
If the teaching material is solid enough, it will need to focus only on the topic at a later stage, with faster and more stable growth.
After that, we’ll see how it works.
The most basic writing issues have already been mentioned above, with a full and complete collection, a half-word around, a half-twice to a third in the last line, and a self-regulating line-and-characterization, which can be used several times to find the most comfortable form that one considers.
There’s a lot of answers to political questions, and if you don’t think there’s anything to write about, it’s a very low chance of score.
The techniques of generality are similar, and I will sum up after history and geography.
History
As is well known, the subject background of the history test is unknown to us.
In order to deal with historical topics, there is still a minimum ability to read and read.
Don’t put a piece of the text there and you can’t translate it.
With regard to reading skills, it is believed that the basic requirements can be met for many.
If it’s a big problem, follow the language teacher and learn the language.
History and science politics are different.
Historic facts and perspectives have been limited, and only basic scores have been obtained in the examination field. The key is the ability to understand the material and to develop the knowledge that it has learned.
On the other hand, there is a personal preference for the “bone skeletal + continuous filling” method.
Bones, by definition, have an overall sense of knowledge of the history of the examination, and what is used to build a skeleton is a few teaching materials.
“Bonescreature” is stereo, shaped.
This requires not only that the basic history of the history books be mastered, but also that, in the process of memory, all the knowledge before and after them be brought together.
Each history book has a different focus, economic, political and cultural.
How far do we have to go with the Bones?
When it comes to old-fashioned economies, for example, you have to remember the context of development, major turning historical events, major figures, major reforms, etc.
When it comes to Tang Dynasty, for example, you have to systematically grasp the economic, political, cultural, scientific and technological aspects of this generation.
It’s easy for me to say here, but it’s not going to be easy, and there’s some memory skills involved.
But in order for history to go up, to make a difference, it is necessary to “get your bones together.”
And how to fill it, how to make its own knowledge system bigger.
In the third year of high school, you’ll have a lot of paper sets and lots of questions and, in the case of historical issues, there will be very few cases of material overlap.
It sounds like it’s new. You want to write it down?
Indeed, those plethora of pieces are not always taken in the examination field, but would it be more informative if they were placed in the framework of educational materials as complementary knowledge of an era, a system, a reform, a person?
For example, the system of examinations is frequent, and we have to make this big question, and it is necessary to examine the material carefully, but is it possible to find the idea of reading it in the usual accumulation?
Absolutely, and most likely.
In order for history to be a work of no one, it is necessary to keep both things in mind.
Of course, history and politics, like, require the preparation of notebooks.
The first is to keep track of a fragmented historical knowledge and the second is to accumulate misconceptions and classics.
As with the principle of political error, you can cut down the very classics you’ve done and post them on them, and sometimes read them together.
It’s not easy to cut, but to write down the new angles and the new answers that have appeared in the standard answers.
It has to be flipped from time to time.
6. Geography
Let’s start with this atlas.
When the grade school ordered this one for us, it started in the second grade, and the geography teacher at the time took it directly to teach.
It has many advantages.
First, the section is clear;
Second, nice layout, good map quality, full colour;
Thirdly, there are answers.
To explain, for example, what are the hydrological features and what are the features of the water system, and what are the characteristics of the water system, and what are the aspects of the water system, when it comes to the most basic hydrological and hydrological characteristics.
I’m sure they’ve all been told, but since you’ve got a tutorial for you, it’s on the back, and it’s on the side.
If you want to get the basics of geography, you’ll have to get those answers back, and you’ll just have to get them straight.
How do you analyze urban areas, the causes of natural disasters, natural wonders, etc.?
And it’s really not much. B5 paper, double-sided printing, small four, just like that.
Two pieces of paper, almost half a month back.
It’ll take half a month to get a big geographical score to medium or even upper. Don’t you want to try it?
The answer line can be short-term, then the next small way.
Geography, not the habit of looking at maps. How do you call it geography?
For example, remember how teachers teach us regional geography.
When it comes to the Northeast, did you analyze all the maps relating to the North East?
What can be seen from topographic maps, what can be analysed from precipitation maps, etc.
Almost all of the knowledge and analytical reasoning points to a map. Maps are essential for geographical examinations, whether they are a choice or a big one.
It can be said that anyone who can find information from a map that no one else can find can get a high score.
Whether it’s in the atlas or in the practice, any map anywhere is worth exploring.
But if you don’t take the sword, you can’t overread it.
On the topic of geographical choice, it is stated here that where we are weak, we must do what we have to do.
In fact, it’s just a few knowledge points.
There are several copies of the Qualifications for the High Examination. It’s the right thing to do and the right thing to do. The teacher used it as a homework for us.
7. Synthetic answer techniques
Option:
In terms of overalls, the choice of the subject matter is given to the world.
It’s almost impossible to pursue a high score of 220+ without a good choice.
There’s not much of a choice.
There’s less time for a three-round review, like today’s 10 geography, tomorrow’s 10 history.
After the third and second semester, the one-day package of options should be guaranteed. I feel like I’m doing it.
Timely reflection, three days short and seven days big. It’s a simple thing to say. It’s up to who can keep it going.
Subject:
Focused.
When we answer questions, we usually follow a theoretical approach, followed by a material analysis. If there is no corresponding theory, such as measures, approaches, etc., then there is a possible score point before analysis.
Split answers are both necessary and essential.
The theory behind the serial number, if it’s the original text of the textbook, then it’s the original.
If it is a professional expression or something that it has accumulated, then it is important that it be simple and dealt with in one sentence.
And a little bit apart from the analysis behind. It’s not very separate, but more than half a word apart than the normal character, so long as you can see the difference.
A combination of material analysis is case-by-case.
It depends on the individual ‘ s writing skills. Language organization is important. Professional, concise, well-equipped and informative are the minimum requirements of a standard answer. We cannot be perfect, but we must be conscious.
To deal with all the major issues, the geographical language of political history, and to achieve high marks, it was important to study more standard answers. Look at the response level, logic and fraction distribution of standard answers, especially in the case of high examinations.
Some of the students may say that the answers to the question of the high examination are simple and not applicable to the examination.
Yes.
But does it mean that the answer to the question of the test is worthless?
In the face of the standard answer to the real question, what we want to learn is its language and logic, rather than the scores of words.
No matter how simple the answer is, there are points and there are keywords.
Can you think of that kind of language? Can you put those keywords on the ground?
The words of a standard answer are worthy of in-depth study and a close examination of the meaning of almost every word, none of which is superfluous.
The teachers must have told you that they will discuss all the key words that can be scored, to the extent possible, not just the answers.
So, it’s important to write more and to have a level.
What’s the level? From the process of studying standard answers.
Moreover, there are students with limited capacity to organize their language, and there is a big problem, with a clear sense of direction, but it is not possible to express it in its entirety and it is very difficult to write it.
Tell you what, write!
At the exam, write all the key words you can think of.
When teachers read the papers, they usually look for keywords, and they don’t care too much about your speech structure. As long as it’s basically over and the keywords are in place, they give you the score.
How to practice expression?
It is important to seize the opportunity when you are confronted with such an unwritten dilemma.
Write all the pieces that you can think of on the draft paper and try to tie them together.
When a complete sentence is formed, the logic between them is analysed, for example, when the two sentences refer to a score point and the two to a second score point.
You’re going to make progress in your speech skills.
The exercise of expression skills is only supplementary training, and probably some of our classmates don’t even have to do it. The focus of subject training is also on the study of standard answers.
I was treated as a negative by a political teacher in my senior year.
At one of these examinations, economic life was more difficult, and scores were generally low and mine low.
The teacher put my rolls and another one of my classmates on the whiteboard to score.
Everyone thought that the student’s answer was more coherent, standard theory plus analytical model, and I wrote it in a more tedious way, and the theory remembers it all.
A lot of kids gave her high points and low points to me.
But the teacher gave me a full score in class.
Because I wrote all the key words in the answer.
However, my writing and language organization skills were severely criticized by the teacher, who, alive, made a full answer low.
That is why I speak my language alone.
I’m not suggesting, to be honest with you, that’s enough, because it’s really time-consuming.
When the ability to express itself is in place, it is important to look at standard answers more than it is when it is written less carefully, with a few answers and key words.
The political response must be sufficient, followed by history and geography again.
The political scores, you think, have a few points, one more than the points.
History and geography, many points, wide-faced, perhaps less words.
8. Small techniques of endorsement
I was lost for a little while in my second year of high school, because this thing of knowledge is really not in my head, and I think about it, and there are problems with methods and mental problems.
I had to read it, and I had to read it out loud.
Because I had a big voice and I had an early self-study that affected the same table, I went to the hallway and I read it to the high school building across the street.
Then he thought he remembered it, but when he did, he could never write anything but vague theoretical knowledge, and he was beaten by teachers.
The solution is actually simple.
When you think you’re back, you put it in your book, and you move on.
If you change places, you can remember everything you’ve just done.
Imagine, if you’re just done, you can’t remember the other environment.
It was also said in the words spoken before, so there is a scientific law to remember, to write backwards, to muzzle and to change places.
Also, try to take notes in a colored pen, of course, each colour should be used for each color.
For example, large headings in purple, short notes in blue, other words in green, and words in other colours. Black words are still the main part, but when you turn more colors, you’ll be a little more happy, always more comfortable than full black words.
It doesn’t matter to be silent, to be silent or to read loud. Personal preferences are different, and there is no need to insist on being equal.
What’s the word for a brush?
Languages:
Do not brush the subject. The individual recommends the Pilot Study.
It’s a relatively small number of questions, and the skills are in place to do it without any pressure. It should be a choice.
Other topics (reading, writing, poetry, writing) are more progressive and are thought-provoking, but do not have to be brushed. There is something that is particularly weak, and that only needs to be specific and targeted.
Math:
Look at the foundations of the individual. In fact, the most popular three-year simulation of five years of high school is not very suitable for students with a weak foundation, because the subject is very difficult, and individuals find it more practical for 120+ students. Mathematical brushes are very helpful in reaching out, but don’t eat when it’s too hard.
The Stakebook series is a good one, not a big one, and it suits you.
It’s got three copies, each one of which is different, so it’s easy to screen students on different bases. I bought the one that was specific to functions, the geometry, and it was just a brush.
I’m the only humanist in Osei’s class. Math is always good. Seniors do not spend too much on mathematics, they do little on brushing, but they follow their teachers in their classes.
I didn’t buy the three above-mentioned books, “Students of the High Tests” , one-third of the book “Scripts of the Cross” , and the “Students of the Five Threes” was finished in the high school Osei, and it felt good.
I hope you don’t have to listen to me. You’ll have to take it seriously.
In this regard, the twilight 38 series and the Kinko series are recommended. There are many types of quality that are good, but the difficulties are uneven and need to be chosen.
English:
Three years of the five years of the baccalaureate. But it’s almost impossible to finish five or three. Quite a lot of things. Want to practice which one.
English does not have to be a set, at least two readings per day and one error. The teacher’s job is included.
Hearings are practiced with the school, and the complete emptiness is weak, and then with reading. If you think you’re slow, you can choke yourself, especially reading.
Summary:
It’s not enough to brush so many.
The ” Five Threes ” is not recommended because there are too many questions, and it would be useful to try the ” Three Years High Examination, Two Years Model ” , which is also a series of books, with fewer questions.
Three Twos was our geographical review at the time, and after the end of the examination, the teacher gave you a single book. Other information is not available.
In fact, there are similar teaching aids and the most popular and often good quality on the market.
I know, a lot of people might like to buy a lot of books and think they might use them sometime.
You don’t think it’s just an illusion of satisfaction to buy information?
I’ve been through it!
It is important to remind you that one or more of the teaching aids used by everyone (other than those written in the school) are the same, and each person uses different methods.
It would be more appropriate to take an hour to take a good look at the bookstore and turn it over.
This is the learning method that I have summed up, and I hope it will be of little use to you. Record number: YX11dPD3aQr
I don’t know.
Keep your eyes on the road.
