For almost 10 years, high-level disembarkants have been participating for three consecutive years in the interview of civil servants in their respective municipalities, in close contact with candidates, in face-to-face contact with a number of candidates, and in mentoring a number of high-level candidates to come to shore and share their experiences with them.
There are no roads on the ground, and most people go. What’s a routine, that’s a lot of people, that’s what everyone says when they go in, and the examiner gets bored, that’s a routine.
It is very exhausting to sit at the entrance examination for one day and to listen to the repetition of similar topics. In reality, some of the candidates were obsessed with the response to the question-and-answer template and saw only a few things on the surface of the interview, failing to grasp the true substance of the subject, leading to a defeat in the examination.
Interviews are about thinking, not a schematic, subject-matters, agency work, and, if you want to get high points, backtracking is definitely impossible. In recent years, both the subject of the interview and the form of the interview have become serious and new topics and forms of organization have emerged. For example, interviews were conducted in structured groups, rebuttal questions on topics, problem types, etc.
Next, the test examiner is tired of hearing, even wrong answers.
I. Emergency response, reflection on the topic of interpersonal relations and apologies
As a service window, you solved the reported underground drainage pipes, but again, the pipes, the sewage flooded the roads, which is worse than before. People think you’re not doing your job well. What are you going to do?
The answer to the training institution: First of all, I would like to apologize to the citizens ‘ friends who have suffered the damage caused by this sewage spill, because our work has not been comprehensive and has caused inconvenience. You’re not sure what you’re sorry for. Who authorized you to apologize on behalf of that. How many government apologies have we met in the real world? There was no complete understanding of the work of the organs, and it was not possible to apologize in the words of an apology, since failure to do so was a matter of accountability and accountability. I’m not sure.
Secondly, I would like to affirm that our staff members arrived at the scene at the first moment when they received reports from the public about the drainage problems, carried out emergency repairs and successfully repaired them. The pipeline of this problem is not within the scope of the last overhaul, and it is true that our work has not been comprehensive, and we will have an in-depth internal review. “Why take responsibility, can you make sure you don’t block it again next time?”
Third, in response to this drainage problem, and given the fact that under-water drainage facilities in our jurisdiction have been in operation for 20 years, and that there are problems of aging, we will organize a team to overhaul the underground drainage facilities in our jurisdiction and to replace them completely, with a view to completing them before the next round of heavy rainfall and ensuring that future underground drainage systems are functioning.
Finally, thanks to our citizens ‘ friends for their supervision and oversight of our work, our political website and the Government’s Weibo Letter are open to all and welcome to report on the problem and make recommendations.
My thoughts: Hello, friends of the press! Thank you to your media friends for monitoring our work and for your interest in people’s lives, which reflects your high sense of social responsibility and deserves our learning.
With regard to your reference to the re-closure of the sewage network and the enormous inconvenience caused by the population ‘ s productive life, as soon as my unit received the report, it was organized for the technical staff concerned to work out the problem, but this time it was very serious. Our technical staff was able to do so 24 hours ago, without success, and the technical experts concerned were organized to travel to the site to study and respond to the problem.
Here I have a request for the help of my media friends and an appeal to the general public not to dump the garbage in the sewer. Last time someone dropped the garbage into the sewer, it was just a few days ago that so much garbage was blocked. At the same time, it is hoped that the general public will find such people and report them to us, and that we will fight them with determination and that we will all work together to preserve our living environment.
Here, I would like to assure you that within two days, this sewage network blockage will solve the problem, and the experts on the ground are organizing the digging and replacing it!
Apologize does not solve any problems, but rather leads to a series of problems, that is to say, an apology recognizes that there is a failure in the job, and that there is a failure that requires accountability and accountability. Is it your responsibility to pursue you or to direct the lead, the main leader? The examiner is a leader. The day-to-day work of the organs is not, and it is impossible to apologize at once. There is a need for government thinking.
“What would you do if you were sent with your colleague Zhang to another office to finish an urgent project, because he had worked at that unit, was familiar with the staff there, was always old friends and the job was over you at once…”
A harmonious team not only facilitates the smooth running of the work, but also enhances the efficiency of the work.
Zhang has worked there, is familiar with the situation there, and I will ask Zhang more about the idea or approach of an emergency project.
Rethinking whether Zhang is talking about work with an old friend has led me to misunderstanding, so I will actively take it right and apologize.
If Zhang is really talking about things, I will remind him of the urgency of this project, and I am confident that he will work hard with me to finish it.
I should do the right thing with regard to the job, and I should do the right thing with Zhang, and, on the basis of doing my job, I should do more to help Zhang and take on the job. In future work, colleagues will be brought together to maintain a team image, maximize teamwork and work actively.
My thinking: First of all, I think that good people contribute to the smooth running of our work, that Zhang has worked in what unit, that he is familiar with his colleagues, and that I should be able to do so in parallel with my work and that I should communicate more and more with colleagues in this unit in order to build good human relations.
Second: I’m having a hard time talking to my old friends. I think the two of us, we’re going to do an urgent job outside, we’re going to represent the unit, we’re going to build a sense of the big picture and we’re going to work together.
In conclusion, I would suggest that Zhang use his own strengths to report more to and communicate with the head and colleagues of the unit, and to seek the support and assistance of his colleagues in the work of the unit. After all, we have come to this unit alone to perform our urgent tasks, and many things need the help of this unit to shape the “inner” and “outside” working patterns of our Lord. I’d like to lead Zhang and come with me to this unit to do this, to see the advantages of Zhang’s career in this unit, and to report back to the head of the unit on my ideas and get his support!
What is true emotion is that each has its own characteristics, an apology for human style, not for everything. The examiner is sick to hear.
How can you apologize if you don’t like it? There is no institutional experience, there is life experience, there are two people in love, and one person always apologizes, and this humble identity comparison is certainly impossible.
Not to mention, how can the organ be the most position- and face-to-face place to apologize, and many candidates reflect on the lack of a bottom line, for example, whether I can’t, whether I can’t communicate, whether I can’t, whether I can’t, whether I can’t, what can I do?
Institutional relationships are the least necessary to apologize, no matter how much the leader criticizes you, no matter how much he calls you, no matter what, you don’t have to apologize. That’s what everyone calls stability.
II. COMPREHENSIVE ISSUES OF ORGANIZATIONAL PLANNING, INSTITUTIONS, AFTER TERRORISM
Many candidates have seen the subject of organizational planning, before, after, after, three steps, and most of the candidates in one examination are in the same way.
A matter can be divided into these three steps in the course of development, so that it can be learned and used, but the question of organizational planning is answered in this way, and it is clear to the examiner how it feels to hear it.
The organizational plan title was the most common one in interviews with civil servants, none of which was due to the simple fact that:
First, in terms of the work of the organs:
As discussed earlier, the subject of interviews is based on the concentration of the daily work of the organ, while the organization of meetings, research, activities, law enforcement inspections (with a regular system of law enforcement) and so on are the most common activities of the unit, in particular of some integrated units, which are almost daily in session and active. It is natural that the topics of the civil service interview organization plan type are regularly taken into consideration for what is a civil servant interview feature.
Second, from the perspective of the interview examiner:
As already mentioned, the civil servant interview examiner is the head of the unit, and the provincial examiner is generally composed of the organizational department, the social service department, the deputy director of the unit, and the senior chief of the political and industrial section, who is generally over 40 years of age. It is impossible to see people on the Internet who say that they’re first on the coast of the province and that they’ll be candidates for a few years.
These examiners have a wealth of experience in the work of the organs and have come a step in the way of basic work, such as the organization of meetings and conferences, and are very familiar with the organization of the activities of the organs. One of the elements of their work now was to organize meetings, events, etc., and it was crucial that a conference event be organized to the satisfaction of the leadership. The organizational planning coordination capacity is therefore an important part of the assessment of an examination.
Thirdly, from the point of view of the rules of organs:
Institutional units are one of the most disciplined, procedural and organizational (lead) authorities. The subject of the organizational plan is one that looks at our procedures (processes) and details. We need to be both consistent with the practice of the organs on procedural steps and well thought out in detail.
It is not a step, and that is what everyone says.
As for clustering, it is all the more unnecessary to speak of every subject, such as an ordinary meeting, where the organizer grouping might be an office of two individuals; and a study, perhaps, where would the head of the division be grouped with a chief?
Of course, there are clusters for big events, but it’s something that’s not familiar to candidates. Why go too far? We need to remember that organizational planning is about things that are as familiar as possible to the examiner, that are common to the organ, that are rule-based, and that are not hypothetical. Before, during and after, it’s the law of all. It’s not natural to use more.
III. COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TOPICS OF RESPONSE
1. What do you think of the fact that some cities have applied for sports events and built large sports stadiums that were then abandoned?
[Institutional Reference Answer:]
In recent years, many of our cities have built sports stadiums to host various competitions, which reflect the combined strength of our cities, the achievements of economic development, the improvement of urban infrastructure and the positive and positive impact of the experience gained in the future development of sport. However (focusing on the rhetoric), there have been many cases of abandoned use after competitions, which could result in waste of State resources and could be a heavy burden on cities due to the high cost of building stadiums.
I think there are a few reasons why this phenomenon, as described in the title, is happening. (Transition sentence)
First, the Government has failed to make a city self-assessment prior to the competition, has failed to reasonably base its application on the carrying capacity of the city, has blindly expanded the urban infrastructure, has done well and has caused waste. It can also be seen that the current Government ‘ s approach to performance appraisal is inadequate, focusing only on immediate results, focusing only on specific projects, and under-estimating the overall benefits of long-term urban development. (e.g. Greece, Rio for the Olympic Games, with heavy indebtedness, with serious consequences later)
Secondly, our sports market has not been sufficiently marketed to provide logistical support for the stadium with the proceeds of marketization. There are not enough competitions of all kinds commercialized in the country, and the budget for competitions is low, and many competitions do not choose large venues to save costs. The costs and human resources required for the maintenance of the complex in the latter stages are too high and the logistics will not be kept up to date. (For example: nest of birds, only a few times per year, what are the annual returns, how much maintenance costs are needed and not enough)
Thirdly, the lack of rational planning before the construction of competitions, the remoteness of some of them and the inadequacy of public transport support facilities have led to high costs of social utilization, a reduction in the population ‘ s utilization of the competitions, and the fact that some competitions are too specialized to be used after the competitions and are vulnerable to extinction.
In response to these developments, we should strengthen planning and management so that the cause of sport becomes the growth point of our economy, while also enriching the amateur life of the vast population. In particular, it should be strengthened in the following areas.
The first is for Governments to change management concepts, enhance the capacity for scientific decision-making and reform appraisal mechanisms. In the event of large-scale competitions and the construction of large-scale venues, a panel of experts is formed to make a full assessment of the environment, the economy and the livelihood of the people, to make a declaration on the basis of the city itself, to refrain from swollen-faced fattening and to firmly refrain from making face-to-face work on sports events.
The second is to vigorously develop the model of commercialization of sports federations and to play the decisive role of the market in the allocation of resources. The General Directorate of Sport and Sports and sports associations should liberalize the threshold, introduce a market-based competitive mechanism, encourage private capital to participate in national sports. Some professional federations abroad, such as the American job basket, the European football league, etc., can be used to create and improve the country ‘ s sports club model, increase the level of marketing, increase the use of the playing field and increase income to ensure the subsequent operation of the stadium.
The third is the rational planning of cities when they are building stadiums. It is important not to be blindly ambitious, to promote low-carbon, environmentally friendly environments, to ensure that the facilities built are accessible to the population, and to make public transport and other facilities available to the public. The new modular approach to the construction of sports stadiums allows for the construction of a number of too specialized and ad hoc facilities in the form of ad hoc modules at the London Olympic Games to reduce the cost of construction and facilitate its removal after the event.
The fourth is to strengthen the management and flexibility of the premises, which can be rented to cover other activities, such as evenings, concerts, festivals, etc., as well as to train and mobilize volunteers to participate in the later maintenance of sports stadiums, to provide social co-management and to reduce costs.
Through a multi-pronged and multi-pronged approach, and thanks to the economic construction of our country, which is now flourishing, we will certainly be able to resolve the current problem of the abandoned use of sports stadiums, which is evaporating our national sport.
I think it’s the type of policy that typically analyzes the reasons, and it’s written for an hour.
We are now interviewing national civil servants, so we try to avoid criticizing the Government. Do you want someone to criticize your home, your home school, if anyone says anything about your home? They may have been involved in the building of the Olympic stadium, and even without direct involvement, there must have been, and everyone would have been so proud to be involved in the Olympics outside! Someone might think it’s ass-kissing, and I’m not arguing with you.
When we interview, we have to be from the Government’s perspective and not criticize it as a journalist. I also do not recommend that the reasons be analysed in the expert’s words and that the response be addressed. The examiner may be your parents’ age and experience is better than yours, so try not to teach the examiner what to do.
It makes no sense to anyone else.
We must also change our thinking, stop insisting on our student thinking and think of ourselves as part of the Government. How sure, how complimentary, how alert, less critical! Criticism is the power of leadership!
What is most important is what we call a response, especially among some of the candidates: more publicity, better legal oversight, more penalties, etc., which in practice will not solve any problem. Or many of the problems of social phenomena are incomprehensible. If that could be done, the experts would have done so long ago, and the interview for civil servants was not a postgraduate interview to hear your response.
Instead of talking about countermeasures, we can talk about what has been revealed through this phenomenon, or about a euphemism. Or do you want to take this example?
1. The organization of sports events increases the visibility of the city and the investment in infrastructure can raise the level of public services (you can think of a few points to say). But the abandonment of the stadium after sports events is indeed painful, not only as a waste of social resources, but also contrary to the spirit of sport and the original purpose of organizing sports events.
Secondly, we can see that, after the Rio Olympics in Brazil, many of the venues in Rio have been abandoned by the Brazilian government, and the entire Olympic village is more like an empty “ghost town”. And after the Beijing Olympics, most of the halls have to be used effectively, some have become national fitness sites, some have become tourist attractions, some have become symbols of the spirit of sport, especially bird nests, water cubes, one powerful steel giant, one gentle, luminous beauty, to which everyone aspires. This reflects the fact that our national Government, when it built the Olympic stadium, was well prepared for the upcoming planning exercise, and that later management and development were well in place, allowing the Olympic spirit and the spirit of sport to continue after the event.
Thirdly, it also reminds us that when major sporting events are being held, we need to make the best possible use of existing premises to avoid large-scale construction; to have a planning case to avoid the loss of life; and to be guided by the need to turn the premises into a full-name gymnasium. You’re not an expert, there’s no need to say a lot of responses. I’m not sure.
Add:
With regard to reflections and apologies, it is recalled that:
First, I am saying not to come up and reflect on the apology, to make it clear that if you are wrong, you must apologize. There are many ways in which you apologize in practice. Language apologies are the most ineffective, and the key is to solve the problems of the masses, which are accepted only by the masses.
Secondly, many people say that not to apologize is to exonerate themselves from responsibility, to be lazy and to throw away. In dealing with issues, the Government is generally multi-party, and what matters most is that you deal with them fairly, openly, impartially and impartially. If you apologize to one, the other will be upset.
Thirdly, real-life work is far more complicated than interviews, such as fish and water, where cynicism does not solve problems and where it is essential to be strong.
□ Makoto file number: YX11mWGky7n
I don’t know.
Keep your eyes on the road.
