What words have become a cliche in the
civil service interview, and the examiner is annoyed when he hears them?
High-score landing personnel, working for nearly 10 years, for three consecutive years to participate in the city’s provincial civil service examination interview work, close contact with candidates, face-to-face exchanges with many examiners, but also friendship counseling many candidates high-score landing, combined with work to talk about their own experience. There is no road
on the earth, but many people walk on it.
What is a routine? That is to say, there are too many people. Everyone says this as soon as they go in. The examiner is tired of listening to it. It is a routine. It is very tiring to
sit in the examination room for a day and listen to similar questions repeatedly. In
reality, some candidates are obsessed with the answer routine template, only see some things on the surface of the interview, do not grasp the real essence of the topic, leading to failure in the examination room.
Interview is a kind of thinking, not a routine, the topic is ever-changing, the work of the organs is also ever-changing, want to get high marks, back routine is certainly not good.
In recent years, whether it is the interview topic or the interview form, the anti-routine is very serious, so there are new topics and new organizational forms.
For example, there are structured group interviews in the form of interviews, refutation questions, problem-solving types and so on.
Let’s talk about the cliche that the examiner is annoyed to hear, and even the wrong answer.
First, emergency treatment, reflection and apology on interpersonal problems. [Emergency treatment example] As a service window staff, you solved the problem of underground drainage pipes reported by the masses, but the pipeline had problems again, and the sewage flooded the road, which was more serious than before. The masses thought that you had not done a good job, and now you came to the reporter to interview. What would you do? Please simulate on the spot.
First of all, I would like to apologize to the citizens who have suffered from the spread of sewage, because our work has not been done comprehensively and has brought inconvenience to you.
The reason is not clear what to apologize for. You apologize on behalf of that. Who authorized you to apologize. How many government apologies have we seen in
real work?
Completely do not understand the work of the organs, how can you open your mouth to apologize, since the work is not done well, it should be accountable.
Secondly, I would like to state that our staff arrived at the scene as soon as they received reports from the public about the problem of the drainage pipe, and carried out emergency repairs, and the repairs were successful. The
pipeline in question this time is not within the scope of the last overhaul. This is indeed because we have not done a comprehensive job. We will conduct a profound internal review.
(Why should you take the responsibility? Can you ensure that it will not be blocked next time? What should you do if it is blocked again? Is it still an internal review? This is a statement that you have no working experience at all and will die.) Again, in view of this drainage pipeline problem, considering that the drainage facilities under our jurisdiction have been put into use for 20 years, there are problems such as pipeline aging. We will organize a team to carry out a comprehensive overhaul of the underground drainage facilities in the area under our jurisdiction, completely replace the aging facilities, and strive to complete them before the next round of heavy rainfall, so as to ensure the normal operation of the underground drainage system in the future.
My train of thought: Hello, journalist friends! Thank the media friends for their supervision of our work and their concern for people’s livelihood, which reflects your high sense of social responsibility and is worth learning.
As for the problem you mentioned that the sewage pipe network was blocked again, which caused great inconvenience to people’s production and life, our unit immediately organized relevant technical personnel to dredge it after receiving the report, but this blockage was very serious, and this time our technical personnel have been on the spot for 24 hours without success. Relevant technical specialist have been organized to rush to the site to study countermeasures, and experts have initially discussed the plan of excavation. I have a request
here. I would like to ask friends from the media to help us appeal to the residents not to dump garbage into the sewer. The last blockage was that someone dumped a lot of garbage into the sewer. It has only been a few days, and so much garbage has been blocked again.
At the same time, we hope that the masses will find such people and things and actively report them to us. We will resolutely crack down on them and work together to safeguard our living environment.
Here, I would like to assure you that within two days, the problem of sewage pipe network blockage will be solved, and on-site experts are organizing forces to excavate and replace it! Apologizing can not solve any problems, on the contrary, it will bring a series of problems. Apologizing is to admit that there are mistakes in work. If there are mistakes, we must pursue responsibility and accountability.
Is it your responsibility or the leader in charge or the main leader?
The examiners are made up of leaders. The daily work of the
organs and units will not, nor can they apologize as soon as they come up.
There must be government thinking.
Finally, thank you for your supervision and supervision of our work, our government website and government micro-blog WeChat are open to you at any time, and you are welcome to report problems and make suggestions.
“If you and your colleague Xiao Zhang are sent to another unit to complete an urgent project together, Xiao Zhang is very familiar with the staff there because he once worked in that unit, and he always catches up with his old friends there, and the task of work suddenly falls on you, how will you deal with it?” A harmonious team is not only conducive to the smooth development of work, but also conducive to the improvement of work efficiency. In the face of the situation in the topic, we will deal with it in the way of communication.
1. Xiao Zhang has worked there and is familiar with the situation there. He must have good ideas or methods for emergency projects. I will consult Xiao Zhang more.
2. Reflect on whether Xiao Zhang’s talking about work with his old friends caused my misunderstanding, then I will actively put my mind right and take the initiative to apologize.
3. If Xiao Zhang is really chatting, I will remind him of the urgency of this project, and I believe he will proceed from the work and the overall situation, and seriously complete the project with me.
4. I should treat the task correctly, assign the work reasonably with Xiao Zhang, and help Xiao Zhang more and take on more work on the basis of doing my work well.
In the future work, I will unite my colleagues, maintain the image of the team, maximize the team’s joint efforts, and actively complete the work.
My train of thought: First of all, I think that good interpersonal relationship is conducive to the smooth development of work. Xiao Zhang has worked in any unit and is familiar with his colleagues. I should also communicate with my colleagues in this unit while completing my work, so as to establish good interpersonal relationship.
Second: In the face of where Xiao Zhang always go to chat with old friends, affecting the work, the pressure of work to my body this problem.
I think the two of us, to complete an urgent task outside the unit, we represent the image of the unit, to establish a sense of the overall situation, do a good job of unity.
Finally, I will suggest that Xiao Zhang make use of his own advantages to report and communicate with the leaders and colleagues of this unit, and strive for the support and help of the leaders and colleagues of this unit for our work. After all, we come to this unit alone to complete urgent tasks, and many things need the help of this unit, forming our “internal”. Xiao Zhang’s work pattern of “outside.”.
I think the leader arranged Xiao Zhang to come to this unit with me to complete this task at that time, which is to see the advantages of Xiao Zhang’s appointment in this unit. I will also report my ideas to the leader of the unit while reporting the progress of work, and strive for his support! [Disgusting reasons] What is the true emotion? That is, everyone has his own characteristics and style of doing things, instead of apologizing for everything. The examiner will feel sick when he hears it. How can
office work apologize for a disagreement?
No office work experience, but also life experience, two people in love, one person always apologizes, this kind of humble identity contrast is certainly not good.
What’s more, the organ is the most important place to pay attention to position and face. How can it be possible to apologize casually? Many candidates have no bottom line to reflect on their apologies, such as reflecting on whether my ability is not good, whether my communication is not good, whether I am.. You can’t do this or that. What do I want you to do?
Organs and units of interpersonal relationships, is the most need to apologize, no matter how the leadership criticized you, even if the scolding can not apologize, you listen to do not refute it (except for principled errors).
This is what everyone calls stability.
Second, the organization plan topic before the event, in the event, after the event, summarizes the experience to file the class many examinees to see the organization plan type topic, as soon as comes up divides before the event, in the event, after the event three steps, an examination room majority of examinees are like this, really lets the human be dumbfounded.
A business from the development process can be divided into these three steps, easy to learn, easy to remember and easy to use, but everyone answers the organizational planning questions like this, what the examiner feels in his heart can be imagined.
Organization plan topic is the most common topic in the civil service interview, no one, the reason is very simple: First, from the point of view of the work of the organ: As discussed above, the interview topic is based on the daily work of the organ. Organizing meetings, investigations, activities, law enforcement inspections (regular examinations of law enforcement power system) and so on are the most common activities of organs and units, especially some comprehensive departments, which have meetings and activities almost every day. What
to use to test what is the characteristics of the civil service interview, so it is natural that the civil service interview organization plan type of questions are often tested.
The 2nd, look from the angle of interview examiner: Had said before, the examiner that officeholder interviews is the leader of each unit, the province takes an examination of an examiner is to be in charge of deputy Bureau chief, politics of seniority of section chief is comprised by branch of constituent department, person society branch, each unit, age is 40 years old of above commonly.
It is often seen on the Internet that some people say that they are the first to go ashore in the province and become examiners in a few years. That is impossible. If the rank is less than seniority, bragging and fooling people should also use their brains.
These examiners have rich experience in the work of the organs, and have come step by step from the basic work of running cultural meetings, and are very familiar with the organizational activities of the organs.
Now one of their jobs is to arrange subordinates to organize meetings, activities and so on. Whether a meeting activity organization is satisfactory to the leaders is very important.
Therefore, the ability to organize, plan and coordinate is an important part of evaluating an examinee.
Third, from the perspective of organ rules, the organ unit is a place where rules, procedures and organizational (leadership) authority are the most important.
The organizational planning topic is a topic that examines our procedures (processes) and details.
We should not only be consistent with the actual practice of the organs in terms of procedural steps, but also be thoughtful and meticulous in terms of details. We
can’t talk about organizational planning issues without the reality of the work of the organs. At the beginning, it is a typical mechanized routine. Everything can be divided into before, during and after the event. This is not a step, and everyone says so.
As for grouping, there is no need to talk about every topic. For example, for an ordinary meeting, the organizer’s grouping may be two people in the office; for a survey, it may be the director with a chief section member. How to group?
Of course, large-scale activities are grouped, but the general candidates are not familiar with the grouping, so why talk too much? One thing
we need to remember is that the organizational planning questions should be familiar to the examiners, common to the organs, in line with the rules, rather than their own imagination.
Before the event, during the event and after the event are completely omnipotent rules, and it is not good to use too much.
3. Make a comprehensive analysis of the topics and talk about the countermeasures, such as the real interview questions. 1. Some cities bid for sports events, build large stadiums and gymnasiums, but then abandon them. What do you think of this.
In recent years, many cities in our country have built stadiums and gymnasiums to host various competitions, which reflects the comprehensive strength of our city, reflects the achievements of economic development, improves the urban infrastructure, and also accumulates experience for the future development of sports, which has a good positive effect.
However, many stadiums are now abandoned after the Games, which will cause a waste of national resources, and because of the high cost of stadium construction, it will also become a heavy burden on the city.
Why does the phenomenon described in the question stem occur? I think there are the following reasons.
First, the government did not do a good job of self-assessment of the city before bidding for the event, did not reasonably bid according to the carrying capacity of the city, blindly expanded the construction of urban infrastructure, craved for greatness and success, resulting in waste.
It can also be seen that the current government’s performance appraisal method is inappropriate, focusing only on immediate results, focusing only on specific projects, and insufficient evaluation of the comprehensive benefits of long-term urban development.
(For example, in order to host the Olympic Games in Greece and Rio, a large amount of debt was incurred for construction, which caused serious consequences in the later period.) Second, the degree of sports marketization in China is not high enough to provide logistical support for venues by using market revenue. The number of commercial competitions
in China is not large enough, and the budget for hosting competitions is not high. Many competitions will not choose large venues in order to save costs.
However, the cost and human resources needed for the later maintenance of the venue are too high, and the logistics can not keep up with it and then it will be abandoned.
(For example, the Bird’s Nest is only used for a certain amount of time every year. How much is the annual income? How much is the maintenance cost?) Thirdly, the planning of the competition venues before construction is unreasonable. Some venues are too remote and the public transport facilities are not perfect, which leads to high social utilization costs and reduces the utilization rate of the venues by the masses. Moreover, some competition venues are too professional to be used after the games, and they are also easy to be abandoned.
In view of the above situation, we should strengthen planning and management, make sports become the growth point of our economy, and enrich the spare-time life of the broad masses of the people.
Specifically, it should be strengthened from the following aspects.
First, the government should change the management concept, enhance the ability of scientific decision-making, and reform the assessment mechanism.
When bidding for large-scale events and building large-scale venues, an expert jury should be formed to fully evaluate the environment, economy, people’s livelihood and other aspects, declare based on the city itself, do not puff up their faces, and resolutely do not make sports events a face-saving project.
Secondly, we should vigorously develop the commercialization model of sports leagues, give full play to the decisive role of the market in the allocation of resources, open the threshold for the General Administration of Sports and sports associations, introduce market-oriented competition mechanism, encourage private capital to participate in the field of national sports, and refer to some foreign professional league models, such as American professional basketball and European football. Establish and improve the competition mode of sports clubs in China, improve the degree of marketization, increase the utilization rate of competition venues, and increase income to ensure the later operation of venues.
Thirdly, the city should plan reasonably when building stadiums and gymnasiums.
Do not blindly seek high and big, to promote low-carbon environmental protection, to ensure that the construction of venues can be used by residents, to do a good job in the construction of public transport and other supporting facilities, to facilitate the use of citizens. New modular construction methods can be used in the construction of
stadiums and gymnasiums. Referring to the London Olympic Games, many professional stadiums and gymnasiums will be built on some comprehensive stadiums in the form of temporary modules to reduce construction costs and facilitate demolition after the Games.
Fourthly, we should strengthen the management of venues and make them more flexible. The venues can be rented to undertake other activities, such as evening parties, concerts, various celebrations, etc. We can also train and call on volunteers to join in the later maintenance of stadiums and gymnasiums, carry out social co-governance and co-management, and at the same time reduce costs.
Through multi-pronged, multi-pronged measures, relying on our country’s current thriving economic construction, we can certainly solve the current problem of abandoned use of stadiums and gymnasiums, so that our country’s sports industry is flourishing.
[Is this answer good?] I think this answer is a typical type of analyzing the reasons and proposing countermeasures. It is estimated that it has been written for an hour. There are many merits. But the problem is that candidates can not think so completely in the examination room, and the language can not be so perfect. We are now interviewing national civil servants, so we try to avoid criticizing the government.
The examiners are all government leaders. Would you like someone to criticize your hometown and your alma mater? Would you be happy if someone praised your hometown?
Give an example of criticizing the Bird’s Nest and think about how the examiner on the other side feels after listening to it! They may have participated in the construction of Olympic venues, even if not directly involved, there must be some participation in the periphery of the Olympic Games, and everyone is extremely proud! Some people may think this is flattery, but I won’t argue with you. When we
interview, we should stand in the perspective of the government, not criticize the government as a journalist.
I do not recommend the tone of an expert to analyze the reasons and talk about countermeasures. The
examiner may be about the same age as your parents and have more experience than you, so try not to teach the examiner how to do it. No matter how reasonable
you say, others will feel uncomfortable. Can you accept a pupil instructing you how to learn in front of you?
We should also change our thinking, stop insisting on our own student thinking, and regard ourselves as a member of the government.
More affirmation, more praise, more reminders, less criticism! Criticizing people is the power of leadership! The most important thing is that the countermeasures we are talking about, especially in the mouth of some candidates, such as increasing publicity, improving legal supervision and increasing punishment, can not solve any problems in the actual process.
In other words, many problems of social phenomena have no solution.
If it can be solved, the experts have already solved it. The civil service interview is not a postgraduate interview to listen to your countermeasures.
Do not talk about countermeasures, what we talk about, we can talk about through this phenomenon, what inspiration we get, or use a euphemistic way to put forward countermeasures.
Or take the above real question as an example.
First, holding sports events can enhance the popularity of the city, and the investment in infrastructure can improve the level of public services (you can think of a few points.
But the abandonment of venues after sports events is really painful, which is not only a waste of social resources, but also contrary to the spirit of sports and the original intention of holding sports events.
Second, we can see that after Brazil hosted the Rio Olympic Games, many venues in Rio have been abandoned by the Brazilian government, and the whole Olympic Village is more like an empty “ghost city”. After the
Beijing Olympic Games, most of the venues have to be used effectively. Some venues have become national fitness venues, some venues have become tourist attractions, and some venues have become symbols of sports spirit, especially the Bird’s Nest and the Water Cube. One is a powerful steel giant, the other is a gentle and transparent water beauty, which makes everyone yearn for it.
This reflects that our national government has fully completed the planning and demonstration in the early stage of the construction of Olympic venues, and the management and development in the later stage are also in place, so that the Olympic spirit and sports spirit can be continued after the end of the event.
Third, this incident also reminds us that when holding large-scale sports events, we should make the best use of the existing venues to avoid large-scale demolition and construction; we should do a good job in planning and demonstration to avoid abandonment; we should do a good job in guiding the venues to become full-name fitness venues.
Think of a few points to say a few points, you are not an expert, there is no need to say a lot of countermeasures.
) □ Shendu. Pay attention and don’t get lost ~
