Why has China developed in the last 20 years as if it had been in the open? – What?
Quantitative variations cause qualitative changes.
Military alone, 30 years ago, not as much as India; 20 years ago, not as Japan and Korea.
Our country has been changing, and our power has been doubling.
After decades of grinding, the goals of today have become the United States.
Military power is the second highest in the world and the absolute lead in East Asia!
And I think ten years from now, the distance from the United States will be significantly reduced.
Let us now go back to the development of Chinese military equipment and the current position in various fields.
The 50s: The Soviet-style New China military industry started only after the US-USA.
Prior to that, despite the existence of a number of weapons factories and large quantities of weapons seized, China lacked the capacity to design large, modern weapons on its own during that period.
The opposition to US aid has significantly improved the position of the new China in the socialist camp, impressing the Soviets on China, which is no longer a mere supplier of raw materials in the Soviets’ minds, but a second power of the socialist camp that can share Soviet military pressure in the Far East.
The anti-U.S.S.A. and U.S.A.A. are followed by 156 industrial projects supported by the Soviets and a series of weapons production lines.
To be sure, Soviet aid to China during that period was sincere, and the top-class weapons produced by the Soviet Union were sold to China without reservation, not only to China, but also to China with the weapons drawings and production lines. Fearing that the new China would not be able to map the production lines for these new weapons in the short term, the Soviet Union even sent a large number of weapons experts to China to teach them how to produce them.
China has thus embarked on a path of weapons development for the Soviet Union.
The typical imitation of weapons during that period, such as the bulldozing of 5 fighter jets, imitating the Soviet MiG-17, was a single jet. Few countries were able to produce jets in the 1950s, and the presence of this aircraft gave us high-altitude high-speed interdiction capability.
For example, the 59-type tank, which imitates the Soviet Union T-54, is also very advanced in China because the Soviet tanks are leading the world. 59 The tank assumed the role of main army tank for a long time thereafter.
59 Tank 59, for example, the ” Chengdu ” class frigate, which imitates the Soviet ” Riga ” class frigate with smaller tonnage, discharges less than 1,500 tons (700 tons) and cannot be compared with the British-American large warship, but to a large extent fills a milestone in the construction of the new Chinese ship.
In the 1950s, with the strong support of the Soviet Union, the New China military equipment was developing very rapidly and in many ways at the world’s best.
The 1960s: While the road to nuclear weapons was the same as that of the socialist camp, in the 1960s relations between China and the Soviet Union broke down, and many historians attributed the breakdown to the differences in the values of the leaders of the two countries.
The underlying causes of the breakdown of relations between China and the Soviet Union: China’s external invasions have come largely from the North since ancient times, with the greatest external danger to the former Chinese dynasty, whether it be the Huns of the Qin Han era, the Lia Jin of the Song Dynasty and the real women of Mongolia, and the Ming Dynasty. In the near modern times, the Soviet Union in the North has assumed the role of an ancient nomadic people, and the Soviet tank flood is ready to subside from the north of China, and the northern plains of China are safe. This is the root cause of the Chinese-Soviet conflict, because a strong Soviet Union will be a problem for China.
After the breakdown of relations between the two countries, the Soviet Union withdrew the Sino-Chinese expert and stopped selling the Chinese army.
China was alone in the 1960s, and two Cold War blocs: NATO, led by the United States, and the Soviet Union, both of which welcomed the collapse of the new China.
In the north of China, there are millions of Soviet armies, and in ’69 there was a battle on the island of China; in the west of China, India jumped, India did not give up on Tibet after the War of China and India was ready to return; in the south of China, the United States is waging the Vietnam War, and Yunnan and the two sides are bound to face significant border threats if the North fails; in the east of China, the United States fleet is stationed in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, etc., and the U-2 United States reconnaissance aircraft is ready to sprint on the east coast. It was indeed the fall of the crisis.
During the 1962 China-India War in response to the imminent war against China, China built three lines to move its weapons factories to the west, typically Sichuan, Shunxi, etc. (to date, Chengdu, Xiang and Shenyang are the three cities of our military industry), in order to avoid a war in which the eastern region fell too fast, and thus to move them to the mountainous provinces. At the same time, one of the major policies of the 1960s was to dig deep, to harvest food. In response to the possible nuclear war by the Soviet Union, China has vigorously launched mass excavations, the construction of various bomb shelters and the accumulation of large amounts of food, in fear that the city’s ground buildings will be wiped out after the nuclear war.
But China’s real military achievements in the 1960s were nuclear weapons.
The leaders that emerge from the fighting are more perceptive of the dark side of the world than most.
They have lived through a jungle society of the weak and have a real understanding of the death of imperialism.
At a time when conventional weapons were lagging far behind the United States and the Soviet Union, a large country like China, without the protection of nuclear weapons, would have to wait for their fate to be divided after the cake had been made, once the development of the economy had been prioritized. This was the case in the pre-morning wars of the Qing Dynasty and the pre-Japanese wars.
To be rich, we have to be proactive in military politics and rely on nuclear weapons.
In 1964, China’s first atomic bomb exploded successfully in 1964, China’s first atomic bomb exploded successfully in 1967, and China’s first hydrogen bomb exploded successfully in 1967. The success of China’s first hydrogen bomb exploded successfully, as well as of its hydrogen bomb, was an important step in the development of China’s nuclear weapons.
But nuclear weapons alone are not enough, because if they are the only ones, but lack the means to deliver them, it is difficult for them to deter the enemy.
As a result, in the 1960s, China also developed several types of military equipment.
In 1970, China ‘ s first nuclear submarine, 091, went into the water. The advantage of nuclear submarines, compared to conventional submarines, is that they have a very high ability to continue and are very well hidden. Conventional submarines, which require frequent sea-to-air changes, give the enemy an opportunity to discover, but nuclear submarines do not, and a nuclear submarine with a nuclear warhead can swim from the East Sea to the United States coast, and when the United States launchs a nuclear attack on China, the nuclear submarine can launch an unexpected nuclear counter-attack against the major cities of the United States. That’s why Mao said: nuclear submarines, 10,000 years.
Nuclear submarine, 1964, East Wind-2 missile launch success. The East Wind-2 missile is the new China’s first ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead, compared to East Wind-1, which, although short in range of 1,300 km and low in precision, is sufficient to threaten the United States military base in Japan and the Soviet Siberian industrial park.
East Wind missile, 1968. In the 1960s, the ideal vehicle to throw nuclear weapons was a strategic bomber, and the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Japan with a B-29 strategic bomber.
Strategic bombers have a longer range and a larger load than ordinary bombers, and thus a much larger size.
Bomb-6 is based on Soviet map-16 bombers, which, to a large extent, has been used until today, and even on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the country’s military parade, to the extent that improved bombardments of 6K and 6N can be seen. Boom-6 was the most deterrent nuclear weapon-throwing vehicle at the time, with a distance of 600 km, which could threaten the core of the Soviet Union. In other words, if you take off from Xinjiang, and the pilot is determined to die, it is theoretically possible to launch a nuclear bomb to Moscow (about 4000 km from Xinjiang to Moscow, and if you do not return, the flight will be sufficient for the bombing-6 flight).
Strategic Bombers Strategic Bombers in the 1970s: In a time of instability, military development was slow in the late 1960s and 1970s, a period of greater chaos in the new China, where the weapons development sector was hit and many military research and development projects were stranded. Moreover, the national economy has deteriorated sharply, State revenue has shrunk significantly and funding for military expenditures has declined significantly. At the same time, the Western world is enjoying the results of the third industrial revolution, with weapons being renewed at a faster and faster pace, and in the 1970s, China’s level of weaponry and equipment was increasing with Western countries.
It was only after the reform and opening up that our military and engineering community discovered that, in addition to nuclear weapons, my country was so backward in terms of conventional weapons. Not only is it lagging behind the United States and the Soviet Union, but it lags behind Japan and Western Europe, but it lags behind India and Taiwan, China, and even, to some extent, Iraq may not be the same. After all, Iraq has imported many advanced weapons from the Soviet Union, and China has not made much progress on conventional weapons for more than a decade.
In 1979, the war between China and Vietnam broke out. This war has been a difficult one for China, which at this time has no clear advantage over Viet Nam over military equipment. It can be said that the 1970s were the lowest in China. The war, however, largely neutralized Viet Nam’s ambitions to annex Laos and Cambodia and prevented the emergence of a military power like Japan in southern China.
In the mid-1979 War of Vietnam, mid-1979, mid-1980s: in the 1980s, when military construction gave way to economic development, China ushered in a spring wind of reform and opening up, the country began to turn to the right path, and the economy of towns and villages and their outward-looking economies were on fire. At this time, the Western countries, with the aim of bringing China together against the Soviet Union, vigorously marketed their advanced weapons to China.
In China in the 1980s, military developments were not as bright as economic achievements.
The reason for this is that during that period my country pursued a fundamental strategy of “sweetness.”
Owing to our weaker economy in the early 1980s, our exports and imports were often in deficit (and now in turn), and foreign exchange reserves were extremely scarce (in billions of dollars), and even when Western countries liberalized their sales to China, our country was unable to purchase much. During that period, a large number of military scientific research projects were laid off, including large aircraft projects — 10 (former of C919) — and many military scientific research institutes were reduced in size.
In 1985, Deng Xiaoping made an amazing move to disarm 1 million people and to use the savings to build the economy. As a result, the 1980s were another low in the history of the development of new Chinese military equipment in the 1970s.
From a later point of view, the decision-making process at that time was wise and helpless.
The global environment of that period was dominated by peaceful development.
In the economic sphere, we have vigorously developed export-labour-intensive industries; in diplomacy, we joined the United States of America in fighting the Soviet Union, which finally brought down the Soviet Union and completely lifted China ‘ s greatest threat on land; and in military terms, it was impossible to reduce our spending, because China ‘ s economy was very weak at that time, the central revenue before the tax system was very low, and much of it had to be invested in education and the economy, and military spending had to be built on what it had previously spent, and its share of GDP had fallen significantly. The basic policy of the State is to build on the weak power of the State.
However, in the 1980s, China and the West were on a honeymoon for the purpose of confronting the Soviet Union, during which time China purchased some military equipment from Western countries in valuable foreign currency.
For example, in the ’80s, the United States exported the Black Hawk helicopter from China.
The Black Hawk helicopter, however, was the largest used helicopter in China, not for military use, but for disaster relief. In the past, in the highlands, almost all but the Black Hawk helicopter had been able to undertake large-scale highland relief missions, and in the Wenchuan earthquake, the Black Hawk helicopter had been able to carry out its work.
In addition to the Black Eagle helicopter, the United States exported C130 Hercules, LM2500 gas turbines (used on board the national destroyer Harbin) and MK42 anti-submarine torpedoes to China in the 1980s.
China has also imported dolphin helicopters from France (later imitated as straight-9), British aviation engines (imitated as vortex-9), Israeli snake missiles, etc.
China has a Chinese direct-9 copy of a French Dolphin helicopter.
In China, direct-9-China straight-9 uses the British engine’s `blast-7′ fighter bombers.
On the occasion of the fortieth anniversary of the bombing of the new China, China’s military equipment levels were significantly lower than those of India, which had been looking at the Tibetan region of our country, which almost broke out in 1987 in the Sandolo Valley.
We can compare the situation of Chinese and Indian armaments in 1989, the fortieth anniversary of the establishment of the new China.
Tank: India wins.
China’s main tank at this time was 80, while India was T-72 (out of the Soviet Union).
The 80-type tank Indian T-72 tank (out of the Soviet Union) Indian T-72 tank (out of the Soviet Union) is mainly three-pronged: firepower, protection and mobility.
In terms of firepower, China ‘ s 80-mm tank uses 105 mm line-barrel (similar to the UK) and T-72 uses 125 mm slide-barrel, which is more powerful and powerful. For protective purposes, 80 tanks were protected by rolling steel plates, while T-72 was equipped with 200 mm composite armour on the front. In other words, a long-range exchange of fire can easily penetrate the former, but the latter cannot be achieved. In terms of mobility, the engine performance of T-72 is clearly better than 80. Air Force: India is winning.
China’s dominant type at this time is also a second-generation machine, such as the Shaft-7 (impersonation of Soviet Mig-21), the Shaft-8.
Zoo-7 (similar to Soviet MiG-21) Zoo-7 (similar to Soviet MiG-21) Zoo-8 (similar to Soviet MiG-21) Zoo-8 (Soviet-21) Zoo-8) Zoo-8 (Soviet–8) Zoom-7 (Soviet-21), while India is dominated by three-generation aircraft such as Mirage 2000 (French-made), MiG-29 (Soviet-made).
The Indian Mirage 2000 (made in France) The Indian Mirage 2000-29 (made in France) MiG-29 (made in the Soviet Union) contrasts with the Trigena, as does the Nokia black and white machine and Apple’s smart machine, where the Chinese Air Force was lagging behind in the world in the 1980s.
Naval: India wins.
In contrast to the Navy, the Indian Navy was clearly stronger than China in the 1980s and even in the 1990s, and India had always wanted to dominate the Indian Ocean, so it was a major development, with two carriers at the end of the 1980s, and a more modern destroyer, while also importing submarines from Germany. It is no exaggeration to say that the Indian Navy at that time had the capability to fight in the open ocean, when the Chinese Navy was mainly based on offshore defence, no carrier, and no large destroyer, and had been transformed by the West into a “yellowwater fleet” that could only perform near-shore defence.
China’s “troika” destroyer (discharge 3700 tons) China’s “troika” destroyer (discharge 3700 tons) India’s “Rajput” class (discharge 4900 tons, Soviet-made) India’s “Rajput” class (discharge 4900 tons, Soviet-made) India’s “Vilat” carrier (British-made) India’s “Vilat” carrier (British-made) 90s: during the decade of the decade 1990s, the Western countries prohibited the sale of Chinese troops and the sale of no weapon to China. At the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia inherited much of the Soviet military legacy, but at the time Russia was in economic distress, China and Russia were on the same page, China bought Russian weapons at high prices, and Russia began the honeymoon period.
But it was the Gulf War that really made China aware of modern national defence and vigorously developed armaments.
The 1991 Gulf War showed the then-China gap with the West.
Iraq in the early 1990s of the Gulf War, known as the third military Power in the world, said that while there was a bragging element, much of the military equipment in Iraq during that period was ahead of China, whether it was tanks or aircraft. Seven hundred thousand Republican Guards, many of whom have also recently experienced fighting, are highly experienced.
But in the face of the information war waged by the United States, where the Iraqi army has failed to respond, and against the backdrop of the fallout that shocked the then-Chinese leaders to know that the modern war could be fought like this, the phrase “the United States army has become communicated before we have mechanized” was added to the list.
The most typical is the purchase from Russia of Su-27 fighter jets, “Kilo class” submarines and “modern class” missile destroyers.
Not only has the country purchased Su-27, but it has also introduced complete production lines, which, after final absorption, have led to the development of Shape-11 and Shape-10, which have also accelerated the pace of research and development.
For its part, the Navy, with the Hirsch Class destroyer Harbin, purchased from Ukraine in the late 1990s the hull of the carrier Varange (which was later converted to the Liaoning) and developed an autonomous 039 submarine.
For the Army, “96” tanks have been developed. In short, in the 1990s, China began the process of military modernization.
But China in the 1990s and even at the beginning of the 21st century was in a more humiliating diplomatic environment.
During this period, there were the “Galaxy” events in 1993, the Taiwan Sea crisis in 1996, the Indonesian Slaughter in 1998, the bombing of the Yugoslav Embassy in 1999 and the Central American crash in 2001.
In 1993, in the case of the Milky Way, the United States unprovokedly accused China of selling prohibited chemicals to Iran, forcibly detaining our freighter, Galaxy, and finally posing a blatant threat to our international sovereignty without identifying any proscribed chemicals.
In 1996, the Taiwan Sea crisis of 1996, the Taiwan Monopolies were in a state of great madness as a result of the invitation extended by the United States to Li Deng Fai to visit the United States in defiance of the China-United States Joint Declaration. Our hundreds of thousands of troops staged military shows across the Taiwan Strait and intend to recover Taiwan. However, as a result of the traitor ‘ s sale, the United States carrier task force had arrived in the Taiwan Strait and had to stop.
A number of Air Force pilots wrote a suicide note and a blood note in 1996, with the intention of splitting with American carriers.
The letter of the Air Force pilot and the letter of the Air Force pilot of the Blood Book and the Blood Book Sea crisis in my country were so helpless that, with its military strength at the time, it could not pose a threat to the United States other than nuclear weapons. The nuclear submarines of China, which had been placed in high hopes, had been detected many times by the United States, sunk many times by the United States model, and shamed as a “seabed tractor” because of their technological backwardness. At that time, China, even with all its naval and air forces, might not sink an American carrier. However, it was precisely with nuclear weapons that China did not become Iraq during the 1970s and 1990s.
In Indonesia, a mass massacre against the Chinese took place in 1998 during the Indonesian Slaughter in 1998, as part of an organized and planned genocide. Thousands of Chinese men have been massacred, while Indonesian thugs lured by bonuses to take pre-doping and then commit mass rape and murder of Chinese women.
If this were to happen today, it would be less likely. In addition, in the light of the Libyan experience of evacuation, my Government will carry out evacuations in advance of the riots. However, in the 1990s, the Chinese Navy was far too weak to be operational, had neither a carrier nor a large transport vessel, and had no long-range combat aircraft. Military intervention in the event of events in Indonesia is difficult, and that is the small cost of the military weakness of the State.
In 1999, the Embassy of Yugoslavia was bombed; in 2001, there was a crash in Central America.
The bombing of the Yugoslav Embassy in 1999 and the bombing of the Yugoslav Embassy in 2001 and the crash of the Central American-American plane in 2001 were two events in which many should have experienced it. Before the war in Iraq in the late 1990s, relations between China and the United States had been very bad, and the United States had shown China many times in an attempt to crush China. However, given the weak military power of the country during that period, the country ‘ s leaders have endured and are committed to economic construction.
In the 1990s, when countries like Viet Nam occupied our southern sands, and in the 1990s, countries like Viet Nam invaded our southern sands. In fact, in the 1990s, it was not only Americans who bullied us, but also Vietnamese, Malaysians, Filipinos, Bruneians, Indonesians.
During the 1990s, several islands of China ‘ s Nansha Islands were occupied by countries such as Viet Nam, which illegally stole oil rights in the South China Sea and produced large quantities of oil, making a leap from oil-importing to oil-exporting.
The root cause of this situation is also the lack of a strong oceanic naval force in our country at that time, and until the arrival of the carrier, neither the aircraft nor the warship could be exposed to the South China Sea. In the South Saudi Sea, it is very difficult to counterbalance South-East Asian countries with the “gang and lake” frigates and the “bong” destroyers alone.
So the great idea of being a Chinese carrier designer at the time of the pennator kindergarten.
At one point, the absence of a carrier was the regret of most Chinese army fans.
In the past, South-East Asian countries have seized and even killed our fishermen in the South China Sea many times because of the lack of carriers.
On the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the maritime tragedy, the new China was created, the level of military equipment on the mainland was even with that of Taiwan.
On the army side, even on a larger scale, the continent was clearly stronger than Taiwan, but it was by no means enough to recover Taiwan, mainly by the navy and air force.
Air Force: Taiwan, China, is stronger.
In 1999, the main strength of the Continental Air Force was the 8-II warplane, known as the Air Man, but in any case it was only a 2-generation fighter with insufficient performance. The three-generation aircraft on the continent, Su-27, which was purchased from Russia, had advanced performance, but too few to produce effective fire suppression.
On the Taiwan side, with the United States-made F-16, French-made phantom-2000, and home-made IDF, all three-generation warplanes, be they air and power systems or radar systems, are significantly higher than the mainland side, so Taiwan has the advantage of the Air Force.
Su-27 (Russian-made) S-27 (Russian-made) F-16 (United States-made) F-16 (United States-made) IDF (United States-made) IDF (United States-made) IDF (United States-made) naval side: evenly.
On the naval side, the mainland and Taiwan in 1999 were even-handed, with Taiwan winning in large surface ships, with only two relatively modern “052 class” destroyers on the continent. However, with regard to submarines, the continent was clearly stronger than Taiwan, which was the reason for the subsequent attempt by Taiwan to procure a large number of anti-submarine aircraft from the United States.
In the first decade of the twenty-first century, the continental “Harbin” missile destroyer “Harbin” carrier “success” (similar to the “Perry class” of the United States) “success class” (similar to the “Perry class” of the United States): China’s military build-up finally opened a period of rapid development in the low 70s to the 1990s, and more importantly, since 2001, marked by its accession to the WTO, China’s economy began to make full use of it, maintaining double-digit growth for many years, and China’s GDP doubled by four times between 2000 and 2010, making it the second largest economy in the world. As a result of the rapid economic advance, China’s armaments have begun to move ahead with the high level of military spending and the previously laid base of military research.
At the same time, the war in Afghanistan began in 2001, in Iraq in 2003, and in subprime crisis in 2007. It can be said that military pressure from the United States has decreased significantly after the events of 11 September, and that China can finally free itself to develop.
China’s economic achievements during this period have left Japan unsustainable. In 2004, China and Japan engaged in a violent confrontation around the East China Sea’s “springy” oil fields. In 2005, Japan’s Self-Defence Forces were granted the right to fire, and some Japanese politicians advocated war against China.
The author saw a foreign media article at the time, where he analysed: “If the battle starts in China, Japan can easily destroy the Chinese navy and air force. This is a great shock to those who are still in primary school. From a later point of view, whether or not foreign media analysis was biased, it was true that China’s naval and air forces were less powerful than Japan during that period.
In 2004, the China-Japan dispute began in the East China Sea ‘ s “Chunqing” oil field, and in 2004 the China-Japan dispute began in the East China Sea ‘ s “Chunqing” oil field. Many attribute the dispute to the issue of the Diaoyu Islands, but the reason for the serious friction between China and Japan in 2004-2013 is that this period was one of China’s catching up and eventually surpassing Japan.
In 2009-2012, when the Chinese-Japanese maritime conflict peaked in 2009-2012, and when the Chinese-Japanese maritime conflict peaked in 2004, China’s GDP was less than half of Japan’s, but Japan has seen a trend towards China’s catching up with it, so it is challenging the East China Sea to influence China’s rise by military means; in 2010, China’s GDP exceeded Japan, making it the second largest economy in the world, and now has reached its highest level of confrontation in Central Japan; and in 2014, China’s GDP doubled to Japan, and since then, there has been little conflict between Japan and today, Japan has become increasingly friendly to China.
It is therefore the military strength of the State that determines its status.
As China eventually overcomes and widens the gap with Japan, Japan becomes more friendly with China and more with Japan, Japan becomes more friendly with China and more friendly with China on its sixtieth anniversary.
On the army side: China wins.
When it comes to the quality of the army’s equipment, it was all the same in mid-Japan in 2009, but in China’s most traditional mainland country, the army is very strong, with the largest army in the world, fighting on land, and the Japanese Land Self-Defence Force was no match for the Liberation Army in 2009.
China 99 main battle tank, China 99 main battle tank, Japan 10 main battle tank, Japan 10 main battle tank, air force side: even enemy.
As far as the air force at the time was concerned, the Chinese air force was in a position to match Japan in 2009, despite the fact that the Chinese air force was clearly lagging behind Japan in 2004. On the other hand, in terms of autonomous R & D capabilities, China’s military industry is stronger than Japan’s, which, although well-developed, purchases many of its military goods from the United States are expensive and subject to human constraints. At this stage, the Chinese Air Force has been able to develop its own research and development capabilities, with Chengdu’s Sung-fing (on behalf of the works Sing-10, Sing-20, Kiryu), Shen Yang’s Shen-Fing (on behalf of the works Sing-11, Sing-15) and Xian’s Sing-Fing (on behalf of the work Flying Panther) being fully flowered.
Chinese Su-30MKKK heavy combat aircraft (Russian-made) Chinese Su-30MKK heavy combat aircraft (Russian-made) Japanese F-15J heavy combat aircraft (US-made) Japanese F-15J heavy combat aircraft (US-made) Chinese Shao-10 light fighter aircraft Chinese F-10 light fighter aircraft Japanese F-2 light fighter aircraft Japanese F-2 Chinese air police-2000 early warning aircraft (Russian-made Ir-76) Chinese air police 2000 early warning aircraft (Russian-made Ir-76) Japanese E-767 early warning aircraft (US-made) Japanese E-767 early warning aircraft (US-made) naval side: Japan is slightly over.
Japan is a traditional naval power, with 2009 as the point of time, when there is still a gap between the Chinese Navy and the Japanese Navy.
According to surface ships, Japan owns a number of modern large surface ships, such as the “Goldong class” and “Love class”, at a time when the Chinese navy has only a small number of 051C, 052C and “modern class” missile destroyers imported from Russia. The Russian “modern” destroyer, which is known as the carrier killer and equipped with the “Japanese” anti-ship missile, may not, to a large extent, be close to the American carrier. The reason for the purchase was the low level of civil-military morale in the country following the Taihai crisis, when a destroyer, known as the carrier, was able to boost the military.
China has 093 nuclear submarines, but Japan also has modern submarines, such as the “Ara Dragon Class”, the “Choose-Choose Class” and the “Choose-Tidal Class” on a larger scale.
According to the carrier, there are no carriers in China at this time, but Japan has a number of helicopter carriers, as well as a large landing ship at the “David Class”. To this day, the Japanese navy remains the top five in the world and cannot be underestimated.
China’s 052C (Standshire of China) China’s 052C (Standshield of China) China’s “Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyper-Cyber-Cyper-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyper-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyber-Cyper-Cyber-Cyber-Cyone-Cyber-Cyber-Cyper-Cyper-Cyper-Cylene-Cyone-Cyone-Cy-Cy-Cy-Cy-Cy-Cy-Cy-Cy-Cy-Cy-Cy-Cy-C On the one hand, the build-up of previous decades and, on the other hand, the continued development of the national economy have provided significant military expenditures for military construction. In 2018, China ‘ s military spending was close to $200 billion, surpassing the combined Russian, French, Japanese, German and second in the world.
This is also the underlying reason why the East and South China Seas have become more peaceful over the past few years. The Chinese Air Force has significantly increased its operational radius to cover the whole of South-East Asia and the Japanese islands; the Chinese Navy, after its carrier service, has become operational in the ocean, and China has become increasingly dominant in the South China Sea. In the absence of intervention by the United States, China is largely strong in East and South-East Asia. As a result, both Japan and the Philippines have become increasingly friendly to China.
In recent years, when the Chinese Navy built its warships at the speed of “low dumplings” in recent years, and the Chinese navy at the speed of “lowing dumplings”, the Chinese navy had outsized the Japanese navy, and the Chinese air force had outperformed the Chinese air force of Japan.
As an updated comparison, this comparison will be more detailed and will include new weapons that are being developed and are about to come into production.
Tank comparison: There are advantages to each other.
The tanks are the kings of the land war, and the assembled tank units will become a flood of steel, shaking the enemy. The U.S. M1A2 main battle tank is a little more successful in terms of integration, because it is equipped with ceramic armour, new types of depleted uranium bombs, and with more advanced information systems, but the advantage of 99A is that it is much cheaper than M1A2 and it is much cheaper to procure and fit for the army.
China 99A Main battle tank China 99A Main battle tank USA M1A2 Main battle tank USA M1A2 Main battle tank M1A2
China has slightly won.
Since it was invented, the artillery has been a battlefield weapon, and intensive artillery shelling has rendered the enemy ‘ s ground forces defenceless. China used artillery to suppress its opponents in the China War. The Chinese artillery technology was the highest in the world, and in the confrontation between the Saudi Government and Al-Husai forces, the artillery coming from China gave United States military personnel the greatest admiration.
China PLZ-05 Self-Defence Howitzer China PLZ-05 Self-Defence Howitzer USA M109A7 Self-Defence Gun USA M109A7 Self-Defence Artillery Helicopters: United States Victory.
The helicopter gunships, known as “tank killers”, were extremely lethal to tanks, and the United States was shocked by the rapid hunting of Iraqi tank units by helicopter gunships during the Gulf and Iraq wars. The helicopter gunships were also able to mount air-to-air missiles against enemy helicopters. The U.S. Longbow Apache is one of the world ‘ s top-class helicopter gunships, which has been tested in the field and has performed extremely well, compared to the Uttar Pradesh-10, which was newly equipped and has yet to be upgraded, but can also be ranked among the top ten in the world.
China Wutai-10, China Wutai-10, United States Longbow Apache, United States Longbow Apache utility helicopter: the United States has slightly won.
The utility helicopters are capable not only of carrying out rapid deliveries and supporting infantry operations, but also of making a significant difference in the response to the earthquake. It is worth mentioning that our ” straight-20 ” utility helicopter can be used in the highlands, which means that if the Indians come up again, we can quickly release our troops to the Tibetan region. The ” straight-20″ shape is similar to that of the United States ‘ Black Eagle helicopter, which has more performance than the old “Black Eagle” model, but slightly more than the latest “UH-60M” of the Black Eagle helicopter, with a more sophisticated vortex engine that provides greater stability in the event of a complex climate.
China’s “Face-20” utility helicopter, China’s “Face-20” utility helicopter, and the United States US “UH-60M” utility helicopter, are ranked in the ranking of US “UH-60M” utility helicopter.
Armoured vehicles support infantry operations and speed up infantry mobility. In general, the U.S. has a unique capacity in the field of armoured vehicles and the United States has a slightly better performance, but the Chinese armoured vehicles are large in size and play a significant role in the fight against terrorism.
The Chinese ZBL-09 armoured vehicle, the Chinese ZBL-09 armoured vehicle, the United States “Strick” armoured vehicle, contrasts with the United States “Strick” armoured vehicle heavy combat aircraft: China is the winner.
Heavy combat aircraft are the best fighter for air power and the main air force, and good heavy combat aircraft can quickly seize air power for us. Overall, the F-22s and the S-20s have advantages and disadvantages. Due to the late design of the S-20, the latter advantage, the advanced air power system of the S-20, the greater radar detection capability and the ability to direct other aircraft through the data chain. Also, the PVID system (EODASEOTS) was installed to detect enemy invisible aircraft in the absence of radar. The advantage of the F-22 lies in its engine and invisibility capability, which is equipped with two F119 engines, which can sustain ultrasound cruises of more than half an hour and speeds above 1.5 Mah. This means that the F22 will be able to get to the battlefield more quickly, take a better launch position, and have better packages of air missiles. The vortex-10B engine currently in use is intergenerationally different from F-119, limiting its ultrasonic cruise capability; it will then be replaced with a vortex-15 engine, but there is also a significant gap between vortex-15 and F119, the most important difference being material technology, which uses the Alloy C titanium alloy, which is lighter in quality and more heat-resistant, and therefore has a greater weight ratio. We have a 20-year gap between engine technology and the United States. The invisibility and possibly weaker than F-22 is about 0.05 for radar reflectors (RCS), reduced to 20 per cent for detection; and 0.01 for RCS, reduced to 30 per cent for detection. In terms of motorization, there are advantages and disadvantages in terms of motorization of the F-20 and F-22, and although the engine is not as good as F-22, duck wing layouts can increase the lifting factor, so mobility is no worse than F-22. Taken together, the two are superior to each other, and the two are likely to prevail in a one-to-one air war with EODAS; but when hunting important targets such as early warning aircraft, transport aircraft, refuellers, etc., the F-22 can win with a stronger engine. However, modern air warfare is more strategistic, and tactical, co-ordinated than a single-machine, can determine the success of a battlefield. Because the data chain communication system is more compatible with F-22 and commands a different type of machine-type operation (e.g., squaw-16, attack 11), the combined capability of the S-20 is greater than that of F22.
China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter aircraft, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ s heavy fighter, China ‘ , China ‘ , China ‘ .
Medium combat aircraft, supplemented by heavy combat aircraft, are cheaper and can be produced in large quantities and can be used in air combat as well as in attacks on ground targets. To a large extent, the two aircraft were designed in part as warship-mounted aircraft and were standard fourth-generation aircraft, F-35 were also exported by the United States to a large number of other countries, including Japan and Korea, Turkey had also purchased them, but the United States refused to deliver the Turkish aircraft because of the deterioration of American-to-earth relations. The FC-31 has not been able to come up with a solution that would fully satisfy the Air Force and has been designed to change its thinking. The F-35 was produced in large quantities by the United States and could be used as the United States Air Force main machine in the future. However, the F-35 has in fact met the criteria for heavy combat aircraft and is expensive to build, but the benefits are vertically available, and cost-effective attendance can be achieved while saving land space.
China FC-31 Fighting China FC-31 Fighting U.S. F-35 Fighter U.S. F-35 Fighter Aviation Engine: U.S. Victory.
Aviation engines are the flower of military engineering and require a combination of materials, thermodynamics and motors. In the past, our air engine was weak, and the engines of domestic aircraft were essentially imported, and once foreign supplies were cut off, none of our fighters could fly. But over the past few years, our aviation engine technology has risen and the gap with Western countries has narrowed. The vortex, which is currently being developed for the 20-20 boom, is about to come to light and will make up for the fact that our country is short-walled on a big culvert. But overall, we still have a large gap between the air engine sector and the United States, which ranks first in the world.
China Turbo-15 Air Engine China Turbo-15 Air Engine United States F-135 Air Engine United States F-135 Strategic Bomber: United States Victory.
Strategic bombers are an expression of a country ‘ s air force ‘ s ability to strike over long distances, not only by dropping ordinary bombs, but also by throwing nuclear bombs, which can effectively destroy important enemy targets over long distances. B-2 can carry out a global bombing mission, invisible, hard to find by radar, with an extremely expensive $2.4 billion, the best strategic bomber in the world and a killer of the United States army. In the past, China’s strategic bombers relied mainly on bombardment-6, which was demonstrated by the National Day parades in the form of bombardment-6K and shelling-6N, but the biggest problem was the short range and lack of invisibility. In the future, this gap will be filled after the shelling-20, and our strategic bombers will be able to throw bombs into any corner of the world.
The Chinese Bombing-20 Strategic Bomber (imagine) China Bombing-20 Strategic Bomber (imagine) US B-2 Invisible Strategic Bomber US B-2 Invisible Strategic Bomber Transporter: US Victory.
Strategic transport aircraft represent a country ‘ s capacity for long-range rapid delivery. Militaryly, strategic transport aircraft can transport tanks, artillery and various types of military equipment to the battlefield; on a civilian basis, strategic transport aircraft can rapidly carry out evacuation missions, and more so in the field of disaster relief. Currently, there is a gap between China’s transport-20 and the United States’ C-17 strategic transport aircraft, both in terms of capacity and range, but the presence of the transport-20 has largely compensated for China’s lack of long-range delivery capacity.
China-China-China-China-China-20 Strategic Transport aircraft United States C-17 Strategic Transport aircraft United States C-17 Strategic Transport Aircraft Alert: China won.
The early warning aircraft, which is the brain of the air force, is tasked with air combat command, is capable of detecting enemy aircraft early and commanding us to fight, and it can be said that it was the United States air force, the early warning aircraft, in the Gulf and Iraq wars, that was able to do so. Fortunately, China’s air police-500 has achieved the highest level of performance in the world, and with the inclusion of a source-phase-control array radar in digital arrays, China’s air police-500 is better able to search and detect than the United States E-3, air police-500, or even detect invisible aircraft, with the disadvantage that air police-500 can carry-9, with limited speed and lift limits, and that we may develop a new generation of early warning machines when C919 or transport-20 becomes operational, not even excluding the design of an early warning machine to carry Mipo radar to deal specifically with invisible aircraft.
China Alert Air Force-500 China Alert Air Force-500 United States Early Warning aircraft E-3 United States Early Warning aircraft E-3 Air Refueller: United States win.
46 For an advanced fighter aircraft, the operational radius is usually short on its own fuel, as is the case for our scavenging-10, which could be about 800 km if it is not accompanied by an oil tank (which normally chooses to guard), meaning that the scavenging-10 from the south to the south sea may face fuel shortages, which would significantly reduce its operational time. With air refuellers, the problem is solved, and it is theoretically possible for the warplanes to fight from morning to night. Our newest air refueller, Oil-20, has largely solved the problem of the short operational radius of the existing aircraft, which can support the air force in the South China Sea. However, compared to the United States KC-46, there is a difference between the “oil-20” and the “fueled” volume.
Oil transport – 20 for oil – 20 for a United States “KC-46” air refueller, and a large United States “KC-46” air refueller: the United States won.
Large passenger aircraft, that is, the large aircraft that has been expected by the civilian population, are of great relevance not only for civilian but also for military purposes. Large aircraft can be used as carriers for early warning aircraft and can be converted into transport aircraft. At present, there is a wide gap between our big aircraft and Europe and America, and there is still much to go in the field of engine technology and air power systems.
China C919 China C919 U.S. Boeing 747 U.S. Boeing 747 Air-to-air missiles: each has its best and best.
Air-to-air missiles are equivalent to the weapons of fighter planes and, to some extent, do not lose to the fighters themselves. China’s “PL-15” air-to-air missile has only recently been developed, using double-pulse engine technology, ahead of the United States in terms of missile engines. In contrast, the United States AIM-120D air-to-air missiles are powerful in terms of operational experience and small size, which can save mounted space. Compare the two.
China PL-15 Air-to-air missile China PL-15 Air-to-air missile US AIM-120D Air-to-air missile US AIM-120D Destroyer: China is the winner.
The destroyers carry out counter-submarine, anti-ship and anti-aircraft tasks, which provide the most direct fire-fighting at times of naval engagement. Good destroyers can also detect and keep enemy submarines and aircraft from returning. But if you look at the technology, the U.S. “Jumwalt” class destroyers are much higher, but the main problem with the “Jumwalt” class destroyers is that they have too many malfunctions and are less stable. On the other hand, China’s “055” destroyers are used primarily for anti-aircraft defence and are more advanced in active-phase-control radar; the “jumwalt”-class destroyers in the United States are used primarily to target ground targets, with different functions. On the whole, the “055” was much better than “Jumwalt” so that the US Navy turned the destroyer construction centre to “Berke-3”, after all, “Jumwalt” burned the money and pulled out, fired a round of $800,000, and could not afford to use a large American army.
Chinese Navy destroyer “055” (Ten tons) Chinese Navy destroyer “055” (Ten tons) United States Navy Jumwalt class destroyer U.S. Navy. The Jomwalt class frigate side: the U.S. is more fancy, China is more practical, China wins.
Frigates are complementary to destroyers and can be produced in large quantities at low cost. The main task is to protect our important ships, such as aircraft carriers. By contrast, the United States of America’s “sea-at-sea warships” are highly skilled, but obfuscated and expensive, considered by the United States Congress to be a money-burning project, and are now almost abandoned by the military. In contrast, China’s “054B” frigates are cheap, functional and highly performing. They can be produced in large quantities, and China wins.
The Chinese frigate “054B ” , the Chinese frigate “054B ” , and the United States Marine Warship, the U.S. Marine Warship carrier: The United States wins.
The presence of an aircraft carrier is an indication of the ability of a State ‘ s naval forces to combat at sea. While it was difficult for my country to fight on a large scale in the South China Sea before having a carrier, the South-East Asian countries that had illegally invaded our South China Sea reef have become increasingly low profile.
If a simple comparison is made between the current air carrier Liaoning and the U.S.-Nimitz class carrier, the gap is very wide, with Liaoning running at only 60,000 tons and the Nimitz class at 100,000 tons; the former taking off in a slide and the latter in a steam-jet; the former in a conventional (varnish) power carrier and the latter in a nuclear power carrier; and, to a large extent, the Nimitz class carrier in a position to lead the Liaoning generation.
The Chinese carrier Liaoning, the Chinese carrier Liaoning, and the American carrier Nimitz, the American carrier Nimitz, are only the starting point in the history of the Chinese carrier Liaoning, and the current national carrier 003 is about to descend, reducing the gap with the latest Ford carrier in the United States. The carrier power system ” 003 ” is still lagging behind and is driven by steam turbines; however, the deck uses the electromagnetic ejection technology, which is said to be 10 years ahead of similar United States technologies. Electromagnetic ejection technology uses direct current power, low consumption and even acceleration, and it can be expected that, in the future, the Chinese ship-carrying aircraft will be equipped with a four-generation ship-carrying aircraft, which will be stung to 31 or even to 20.
With regard to power systems, the continued use of “003” steam power systems is due to the fact that the main area of activity of our naval forces is still in the Western Pacific region, that there is not much to be done for the time being before Taiwan returns, and that our nuclear power reactor technology is still premature. In the long run, if we want to replace the United States as a world leader, we need to develop nuclear power carriers, and steam power is enough for 80,000 tons of “003,” but 100,000 tons of aircraft need nuclear power to drive.
China’s “003” carrier (image image) China’s “003” carrier (image image) US Ford-class carrier and US Ford-class carrier submarine: US wins, China follows fast.
Nuclear submarines are divided into attack nuclear submarines, which are used in combat, with anti-ships, anti-submarine missions and the greatest threat to aircraft carriers, and strategic nuclear submarines with nuclear weapons, which are used for nuclear deterrence and can respond to enemy States in the event of a nuclear attack.
The most critical measure of the performance of nuclear submarines is the level of silence, which, in the past, our nuclear submarines had a very high noise level of 165 decibels, and the United States military base in Guam had easy access to our nuclear submarines, to the extent that the United States mocked China ‘ s nuclear submarines as a “seabed tractor” during the Taiwan Sea crisis of 1996. However, with technological progress, the quiet capacity of our nuclear submarines has increased significantly. Among the two submarines, “095 ” and “096 ” , the application of an axle pump-jet electromagnetic propulsion technology has significantly increased the level of quiet and noise has been reduced to 95 dB, which is close to the United States nuclear submarine level. The existence of the “096 ” nuclear submarines has made the western coast of the United States a nuclear strike and has significantly increased our national security capabilities.
China ‘ s “095 ” attack nuclear submarine, China ‘ s “095 ” attack nuclear submarine, China ‘ s “095 ” attack nuclear submarine, the United States ‘ “Sea Wolf ” attack nuclear submarine, China ‘ s “096 ” strategic nuclear submarine, China ‘ s “096 ” strategic nuclear submarine (imagine) China ‘ s “096 ” strategic nuclear submarine (image image), the United States ‘ “Ohio ” strategic nuclear submarine, America ‘ s “Ohio ” strategic nuclear submarine amphibious landing: the United States wins.
By definition, amphibious landing vessels are used primarily to carry military strength for landing, and in the future, if the question of Taiwan is not resolved by force, amphibious landing vessels will play a crucial role, not only in transporting soldiers, but also in transporting tanks, armoured vehicles, helicopters, artillery, etc. The lack of vertical lift-off aircraft in China compared to the United States-class amphibious landing ship is a major drawback. But sooner or later, the next four generations will land, and the gap with the United States will narrow.
The Chinese amphibious landing ship “075” in China and the United States amphibious landing ship “U.S. class” in the United States: China wins.
Fleet missiles are used against enemy ships by equipping them with missiles on board. China has always attached importance to anti-ship missile technology in order to deal with potential carriers of invasion. To this day, China has been a global leader in anti-ship missile technology, which can be launched vertically.
The Chinese anti-ship missile Eagle Strike-18 (YJ-18) and China ‘ s anti-ship missile Eagle Strike-18 (YJ-18) and the U.S. ‘S. ‘Pock ‘ anti-ship missile: US ‘Pocket’ submarine-fired missile: Chinese-American drawback.
As a result of China ‘ s long-standing emphasis on nuclear counter-attack capabilities, submarine-launched missiles, which are generally mounted on nuclear submarines and can, if necessary, be used to carry nuclear warheads to counter enemy targets, have been developed significantly. As far as current parameters are concerned, the performance of submarine-launched missiles in China and the United States does not differ significantly. The future Big Wave-3 will be used on board the “096” nuclear submarine.
China’s “JL-3” submarine missile, China’s “JL-3” submarine missile, the United States “Trident 2” submarine missile, and the United States “Trident 2” submarine missile: China’s slightly more than China’s.
The close defence gun is the last line of defence for the warship and is equivalent to the role of gatekeeper. The requirements for intercepting enemy-backed missiles are speed of reaction, high fire density and wide range of interception. China’s “1130” close defense gun, capable of targeting more than 40 targets at once, with a maximum firepower of 10000 rounds per minute, well above the US 4500 rounds per minute. The fire is extremely heavy, leaving enemy missiles without access.
China’s “1130” and China’s “1130” and “U.S.’s” and “Intension” and “U.S.’s” and “Intension” and “U.S.’s” and “U.S.’s” and “U.S.’s”.”
Air defence missiles and, indeed, entire air defence systems are essential to the national defence security of a State, not only to intercept aircraft but also to intercept incoming missiles, including nuclear bombs. Our current use of anti-aircraft missiles is mainly a “red flag” series, compared to the United States, which uses mainly “patriotic” air defence systems, which have more extensive operational experience. The SAD system installed in Korea is also part of the anti-aircraft system, but it will, to a large extent, expose our military information in North-East and North-East China to the United States, and will therefore oppose SAD’s entry into Korea.
“Red Flag-9 (HQ-9)” anti-aircraft missile in China “Red Flag-9 (HQ-9)” The U.S. Patriot-3 anti-aircraft missile, the U.S. Patriot-3 anti-aircraft missile navigation satellite system: the U.S. is the winner.
Satellite navigation systems determine, to a large extent, whether or not the missiles are capable, and are essential in both civilian and military fields. For the time being, GPS satellite navigation systems are operating over a long period of time and with a high level of maturity, there are gaps between our Beidou navigation system and GPS, and GPS atomic clocks are more sophisticated and more mature. In East Asia, however, Beidou has a more precise positioning capability than GPS, as Beidou satellites cover more heavily in East Asia than elsewhere.
China’s “Beidou” satellite navigation system, China’s “Beidou” satellite navigation system, USA’s “GPS” satellite navigation system, USA’s “GPS” satellite navigation system rocket: America won.
Rockets can transport satellites, even space shuttles, to space and have a significant impact on the detection and openness of the universe. In the case of strategic missiles, rocket technology also makes a significant contribution, as it breaks through the atmosphere during launch and applies many rocket principles. However, in order for a satellite to be delivered into space, a rocket would have to go beyond the speed of the first universe and, in the light of the constant law of kinetics, its own weight and capacity would be limited and would require a multi-stage structure.
The more intuitive test of rocket performance is its capacity, with 25 tons of our Long March-5 heavy rocket capacity, using liquid oxygen engines, and 64 tons of heavy falcon rocket capacity, also using liquid oxygen engines, in the United States of America. According to the Tsyolkovsky equation, the final speed of the rocket = engine jet velocity xln (total rocket mass dry mass), the future motor performance will determine the rocket’s capacity, given that the structure and quality of the rocket remain unchanged. Increased rocket capacity will have to start with improved engine performance, and in the future we may have to replace more advanced hydrogen engines.
China’s Long March-5 heavy rocket, China’s Long March-5, China’s private-sector American company SpaceX, the heavy falcon, and the US private-sector company SpaceX, the “heavy falcon” large-scale rocket laser: China won a little.
The best advantage of laser weapons is that they can be anti-satellites and, in the event of a full-scale war in the future, laser weapons can destroy enemy satellite systems and paralyse enemy State detection and command capabilities. China ‘ s laser weapons begin early, technology leads globally and ASAT capabilities are strong. China and America have thousands of pieces of Electromagnetic Orbital Guns similar to Laser Weapons (a very fast, very powerful and very far-off cannon, driven by Lorenz).
Laser weapons indicative laser weapons indicative of electromagnetic and electronic confrontations: good and bad.
In today ‘ s ICT war, electromagnetic resistance is increasingly important. The repeated use of electromagnetic pulse bombs by the United States during the Kosovo war paralysed the Yugoslav electricity sector and failed the entire national information system. Thus, for more than two decades, my country has been developing its Electromagnetic confrontational capacity and has achieved great achievements. As our computer and electronics industries have flourished, there has also been a marked increase in electronic resilience. If the future requires the freeing of Taiwan by force, the electromagnetic pulse bomb is a choice, and it can take Taiwan out of combat without blood. In addition to electromagnetic confrontations, electronic confrontations, including radar warfare, are the manifestation of an information war in which the United States forces in the Gulf War completely paralysed Iraq’s radar system and completely neutralized the air defence system. During the Taiwan Strait crisis in 1996, the United States military ‘ s electromagnetic interference rendered our fighter jet radar inoperable and showed the screen. For decades now, our country has also been vigorously developing its electronic confrontational capacity, as demonstrated by the information combat teams of the National Day parade.
Electromagnetic confrontations and electronic confrontations indicative Electromagnetic confrontations and electronic confrontations indicative information battles: each of them has its own.
With the spread of computer technology, information warfare has become more and more important and is a key part of the information war. The power of Chinese hackers is well known in the world. The United States is the leader of the Internet, and its information warfare capabilities are strong, and it attaches particular importance to the building of cyber-armies. However, China has a large population base and a larger number of potential hackers, and the United States should make no distinction between China and China in terms of information warfare.
On cruise missiles: good and bad.
The cruise missiles, with their small size, long range and high stability, and the United States Axes cruise missiles, which have been “demonstrably successful” in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, have been able to accurately destroy vital enemy targets. China’s newest Sword-100 cruise missile, compared to the United States War Ax, is less accurate because of the weakness of satellite positioning systems and is currently capable of only road-based launches. But the advantage of “Sword 100” lies in the ability to travel beyond sound speed.
China’s Long Sword-100 cruise missile, China’s Long Sword-100 cruise missile, and the US War Ax cruise missile, the US War Ax cruise missile, have a supersonic ballistic missile: China won.
Ultrasonic ballistic missiles, the fastest tactical missile in the world, can strike important targets (e.g. carriers) at a very fast pace, which has already hit enemy radar even before they are detected. East Wind-17 ultra-high-sonic ballistic missiles with a range of 1800-2500 km, with a cruise speed of 10 times the sound speed, with the most rapid end-to-end blast speed of 20 times the sound speed, using the method of drifting (money-to-son ballistics) proposed in the 40s, which allows for gliding. Twenty times the speed of sound, it is too fast. In today ‘ s world, no country can prevent a missile so fast.
China ‘ s ‘East Wind-17 ‘ ultra-high-sonic ballistic missile, ‘East Wind-17 ‘ As for the United States, no breakthrough has been observed, many years ago the United States proposed “X-51A” is still being tested.
At the time of the Taiwan Sea crisis in 1996, our country might not have been able to sink an American carrier, even if it had wiped out all its naval and air forces. Today, with East Wind 17, any American carrier in the Western Pacific region will become a live target, and it is gratifying that the Air Force pilots have finally stopped writing their suicide notes.
Strategic intercontinental missiles: China wins.
Strategic intercontinental missiles, which are generally used to carry nuclear warheads for strategic nuclear counter-attacks against enemy States, are a full demonstration of national verification capabilities. East Wind-41 uses a level-III solid rocket, with a range of 14,000 km and a speed of up to 25 mah (25 velocity) and multi-stage nuclear warheads, with a separation strike. In other words, East Wind-41 can hit New York in over 20 minutes and level New York. It is called the Dynasty of the Nation because the existence of East Wind-41 has completely dispelled the idea of a full-scale war against China.
The United States strategic intercontinental missile is a product of the cold war and lags behind the Chinese generation, with East Wind-41 leading the American “militia-3” missile.
Zhong Guo Dynasty: China’s China’s East Wind-41 (DF-41) Strategic Intercontinental Missiles: China’s China’s East Wind-41 (DF-41) Strategic Intercontinental Missiles, and the United States Militia-3 strategic intercontinental missile, the United States Militia-3 strategic intercontinental missile, conclude that our country is currently slightly ahead of the United States in terms of its army and rocket forces, and that there is a wide gap between the Navy and the Air Force. But on the whole of the planet, my country deserves the second most.
It’s been 30 years and 30 years, and it’s finally a day of ablaze.
Modern national defence could not be bought in comparison with economic achievements, and the military achievements of the new China had been much greater, particularly in the last two decades, almost cross-border development.
Why can China achieve so much?
First of all, it is important because of the increase in military spending as a result of the rapid growth of the economy, which is still significant because of the size of the economy, despite the fact that our military expenditure represents only a small percentage of GDP.
But the more important point is that my country has always believed in the logic that “modern national defence cannot be bought”, and that a large country can guarantee its own national security only if it follows the path of weapons development that is developed independently. As a result, although some of our weapons have been imported from abroad, we have adhered to the “introducing — imitation-learning-innovation” path, typical of the Soviet-27 fighters imported from Russia, who, after learning the technology of digestive production, have developed their own saboteur-11. With respect to reverse dismantling capacity, our country is a global leader, and as long as samples are available, we can, in most cases, learn how to develop by dismantling and reassembly.
The obvious contrast is that India, a country that is a country that sells weapons to India in large quantities, both in Russia and in the United States and in Europe, both diplomatically and in the 1970s and 1980s, when India’s military equipment was much more advanced than ours, and during which time India’s military industry had some strength. However, more than 40 years later, India ‘ s defence industry has been left behind by our country, and weapons are essentially imported, requiring considerable foreign exchange each year. As weapons and equipment are purchased from other countries, there are frequent failures.
India has always had a unified South Asia and its ambitions to dominate the Indian Ocean have always been one South Asia, and its ambitions to dominate the Indian Ocean, but its autonomous research and development capacity is weak, leading to frequent failures of its military equipment, affecting its ambitions, but its own research and development capacity is weak, and affecting its arrogant ambitions, “born in distress, dying in peace.”
One of the reasons why China has embarked on the path of self-development of military equipment is that, since the 1990s, Europe and the United States have adopted a policy of banning sales to China’s military, while India has always been a good buyer for arms purchases and can buy whatever it wants. But the result is that China, which has been forced to develop weapons on its own, has finally become a world power of military and scientific research. India, for more than four decades, has been unable to meet its combat needs with a national warplane, LCA (equivalent to Zero-10), with no characteristics other than high cost and prone to failure. It is in this light that, thanks to the ban on sales of Chinese troops by Europe and the United States, our country has been completely placed on the path of independence and independence and today ‘ s military achievements.
Today, relations between China and the United States have deteriorated, with the United States deliberately restricting the export of chips to China, with the risk of a decoupling of its economy, and the view has been expressed that, once the United States has restricted its export of technology to China, China will face the collapse of its economy.
In my view, this view is very unstructured. On military equipment, Europe and the United States limited China to 30 years, forcing China to become the second largest military Power in the world. Can China be hit hard by limiting the export of a chip? In some sense, we should thank Trump. In recent years, the State has given strong support to the chip industry and a large number of enterprises have invested in its development. In time, China’s chip industry can later rise up like weapons, which is just a matter of time.
As for the decoupling of the Central American economy, although this is not what the public would have wanted, the probability of future decoupling of the Central American economy is not low, in the light of the historical struggle of the great Powers. It is important to know that the existing international division of labour system is that Europe and the United States occupy the upper part of the industrial chain, that Japan and Korea occupy the middle, and that emerging countries, such as China, assume positions in the middle and lower end of manufacturing. The decoupling of the US-China economy means that China has the opportunity to re-establish a more equitable and rational system of international division of labour, under which yellow people do not have to go through 996 to earn hard money. In this sense, the decoupling of the US-China economy is not necessarily all bad.
In view of the current trend, China is pursuing the United States in the economic, scientific and military fields, and it is expected that in a decade, the gap between China and the United States in the military field will be further narrowed or even even balanced, by which time our defence security in the Western Pacific region will be fully guaranteed.
At the end of the era, my country ‘ s position in the world was extremely tragic and was ravaged by the imperialist countries, the first opium war, the second opium war, the China-Russian Treaty of Beijing, the Chinese-French war, the China-Japan midday war and the aggression by the eight-Power coalition forces against China. At that time, almost all the world’s powerful countries had abused China once and for all, with vast areas of land being ceded, large amounts of silver being lost and a large number of people suffering from war.
The status of our country has still not improved during the period of the Republic, with the free shelling of our territory by the powerful, the forcible independence of Mongolia, the total invasion of China by Japan, the fall of vast areas of the country, the near absence of war and the risk of national loss.
The underlying reason was that, during that period, my country had no strong national defence. Despite high GDP, the lack of strong national defence has left people to kill. The wealth accumulated during the decade by the Qing Dynasty Ocean Affairs Movement and the gold of the people of the Republic will only make its eyes red and its economic achievements plundered. The Song Dynasty is the most typical example of a country that, because of its economic prosperity and lack of strong force, can end up being invaded by its neighbours and ended in death.
Therefore, if a country is to develop and be strong, it has to learn to live, not to live, not to develop. Many have questioned why China was unable to reform and open up its economy in the 1950s and 1960s, because it did not see the international environment in which it was in the 1950s, when neither the United States nor the Soviet Union allowed a new world power to emerge, when the only way to do so was to develop nuclear weapons, without a single bullet, and when China’s reform and rapid economic development had long been reduced to fish on the table, a nuclear bomb that gave China a chance to rise peacefully.
In the 1980’s, when the country’s ill-gotten national policy was inconvenient, the military was weak, and faced with the provocations of the United States and even the small South-East Asian countries, the Chinese fishermen could only endure humiliation, even if they were illegally detained and shot dead in the South China Sea.
We do not seek hegemonicism, but we need to know that truth is within the range of artillery, that there is no strong national defence, that we can only wait for the same fate as Iraq, that we have enjoyed peace for many years, and that we should also be aware that war is the preponderant melody of human history, that we can live in peace and that we need to be fortunate.
Author of the book: The most beautiful Tang Poe.
I don’t know.
Keep your eyes on the road.
